Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Anatomy of the Eyeball01:20

Anatomy of the Eyeball

11.7K
The eye is a spherical, hollow structure composed of three tissue layers. The outer layer — the fibrous tunic, comprises the sclera — a white structure — and the cornea, which is transparent. The sclera encompasses some of the ocular surface, most of which is not visible. However, the 'white of the eye' is distinctively visible in humans compared to other species. The cornea, a clear covering at the front of the eye, enables light penetration. The eye's middle...
11.7K
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

1.9K
Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.
1.9K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.6K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of ceftiofur administration and <i>Escherichia coli</i> inoculation on the calf fecal microbiome.

mSystems·2026
Same author

Comparing postoperative reading performance and visual outcomes of a non-diffractive EDOF-IOL versus a monofocal IOL: a randomized controlled eye movement study.

BMC ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Bacterial communities of fungus-growing ant queens are species-specific and suggest vertical transmission.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Correction: Microbial exchange at the wildlife-livestock interface: insights into microbial composition, antimicrobial resistance and virulence factor gene dynamics in grassland ecosystems.

Animal microbiome·2025
Same author

Color Vision 2025: Introduction by the feature editors.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2025
Same author

Microbial exchange at the wildlife-livestock interface: insights into microbial composition, antimicrobial resistance and virulence factor gene dynamics in grassland ecosystems.

Animal microbiome·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
09:28

Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice

Published on: June 23, 2023

4.0K

Orientation and Spatial Frequency Selectivity following Adaptation: A Reaction Time Study.

Sotiris Plainis1, Neil R A Parry2, Panagiotis Sapountzis3

  • 1Institute of Vision and Optics (IVO), University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK plainis@med.uoc.gr.

Perception
|November 13, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study used reaction times (RTs) to measure visual adaptation to orientation and spatial frequency. Faster RTs indicate stronger adaptation, revealing rapid recovery mechanisms.

Keywords:
adaptationcontrastorientationreaction timespatial frequency

More Related Videos

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

7.0K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
09:28

Author Spotlight: An Accurate and Quantitative Approach to Study Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice

Published on: June 23, 2023

4.0K
A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

7.0K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Vision science
  • Perceptual psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual adaptation influences perception and performance.
  • Understanding adaptation mechanisms is crucial for visual neuroscience.
  • Traditional methods for studying adaptation can be time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine orientation and spatial frequency sensitivity using reaction times (RTs) within an adaptation paradigm.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of RTs as a measure of visual adaptation.
  • To investigate the time course of adaptation recovery.

Main Methods:

  • Measured simple reaction times (RTs) to Gabor patch stimuli.
  • Employed an adaptation paradigm where observers adapted to gratings of varying orientations and spatial frequencies.
  • Transformed RTs to effective contrast reduction using RT-based contrast response functions.

Main Results:

  • RTs increased significantly (100-150 ms) when test and adapting stimuli shared orientation or spatial frequency.
  • Adaptation effects diminished with increasing differences in orientation or spatial frequency.
  • Average bandwidths were 17.4° for orientation and 1.24 octaves for spatial frequency.
  • Rapid adaptation recovery observed with a half-life of 13-23 seconds.

Conclusions:

  • RTs provide a rapid and sensitive measure of visual adaptation.
  • The method offers advantages over traditional approaches for assessing suprathreshold adaptation.
  • RT-based measurements reveal rapid recovery dynamics of visual adaptation mechanisms.