Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
The Influence of Attention Set, Working Memory Capacity, and Expectations on Inattentional Blindness
Carina Kreitz1, Philip Furley2, Daniel Memmert2
1Institute of Cognitive and Team/Racket Sport Research, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany c.kreitz@dshs-koeln.de.
Abstract:
The probability of inattentional blindness, the failure to notice an unexpected object when attention is engaged on some primary task, is influenced by contextual factors like task demands, features of the unexpected object, and the observer's attention set. However, predicting who will notice an unexpected object and who will remain inattentionally blind has proven difficult, and the evidence that individual differences in cognition affect noticing remains ambiguous. We hypothesized that greater working memory capacity might modulate the effect of attention sets on noticing because working memory is associated with the ability to focus attention selectively. People with greater working memory capacity might be better able to attend selectively to target items, thereby increasing the chances of noticing unexpected objects that were similar to the attended items while decreasing the odds of noticing unexpected objects that differed from the attended items. Our study (N = 120 participants) replicated evidence that task-induced attention sets modulate noticing but found no link between noticing and working memory capacity. Our results are largely consistent with the idea that individual differences in working memory capacity do not predict noticing of unexpected objects in an inattentional blindness task.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Schemas
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Blind Procedures
Working Memory
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Actor-Observer Effect

