Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

How does ChatGPT respond to stuttering-related frequently asked questions? A mixed-methods, cross-version comparison.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026

Same author

Adoption of circular agricultural practices among small-scale farmers.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Enhancing speech fluency in adults who stutter: A randomised controlled trial of anodal tDCS combined with fluency-shaping intervention.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026

Same author

Optimal operation of multi-carrier energy systems integrated with renewable energy sources and hydrogen storage systems.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Comparison of Deep SMAS Lift and MACS in Facelift: A Meta-Analysis.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2026

Same author

Sustainable operation of multi-energy systems under cooperative and non-cooperative strategies.

Scientific reports·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Mechanical and Biological Analysis in Tendinopathy Research

Author Spotlight: Integrating Mechanical and Biological Analysis in Tendinopathy Research

Published on: March 1, 2024

The tendon approximator device in traumatic injuries.

Kamal S Forootan, Hamid Karimi¹, Nazilla-Sadat S Forootan

¹Department of Plastic Surgery, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, P.O. 19395-4949, Iran. karimihamid11@gmail.com.

Recent Patents on Biotechnology

|November 14, 2015

Summary

A new tendon approximator device significantly reduces surgical time for tendon repairs. This innovative tool offers comparable patient outcomes to conventional methods, proving effective and cost-efficient for tendon laceration treatment.

More Related Videos

An in vivo Rodent Model of Contraction-induced Injury and Non-invasive Monitoring of Recovery

An in vivo Rodent Model of Contraction-induced Injury and Non-invasive Monitoring of Recovery

Published on: May 11, 2011

Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery

Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery

Published on: October 6, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Mechanical and Biological Analysis in Tendinopathy Research

Author Spotlight: Integrating Mechanical and Biological Analysis in Tendinopathy Research

Published on: March 1, 2024

An in vivo Rodent Model of Contraction-induced Injury and Non-invasive Monitoring of Recovery

An in vivo Rodent Model of Contraction-induced Injury and Non-invasive Monitoring of Recovery

Published on: May 11, 2011

Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery

Polytetrafluoroethylene PTFE as a Suture Material in Tendon Surgery

Published on: October 6, 2022

Area of Science:

Orthopedic Surgery
Biomedical Engineering
Surgical Innovation

Background:

Precise approximation of tendon endings is crucial for successful tendon repair outcomes.
Tendon lacerations require effective methods for tension-free approximation.
Evaluating new devices for tendon repair is essential to improve surgical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the efficacy of a novel tendon approximator device in tendon laceration repairs.
To compare the operative time, surgeon satisfaction, and patient outcomes of the new device versus conventional methods.

Main Methods:

A comparative study involving 99 patients and 266 tendons repaired with the new device.
Data collected included operative time, surgeon satisfaction, and long-term patient outcomes.
Outcomes were compared to a control group using conventional tendon repair techniques.

Main Results:

The tendon approximator device significantly reduced repair time per tendon (2 min vs. 5.5 min).
Functional results and tendon rupture rates were comparable between the device and conventional groups.
Patient follow-up averaged 3 years, demonstrating sustained outcomes.

Conclusions:

The new tendon approximator device is a feasible, cost-effective tool for tendon repair.
It significantly decreases operative time while maintaining comparable functional outcomes to traditional methods.
This device represents a valuable advancement in surgical treatment for tendon lacerations.