Comparison of sEMG processing methods during whole-body vibration exercise
Karin Lienhard1, Aline Cabasson2, Olivier Meste2
1University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, I3S, UMR7271, Sophia Antipolis, France; University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, LAMHESS, EA 6312, Nice, France; University of Toulon, LAMHESS, EA 6312, La Garde, France.
Summary
Spectral linear interpolation and band-stop filters effectively remove artifacts in surface electromyography (sEMG) signals during whole-body vibration (WBV) exercises, improving muscle activity quantification.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Exercise Physiology
- Signal Processing
Background:
- Quantifying muscle activity using surface electromyography (sEMG) during whole-body vibration (WBV) exercises is challenging due to artifacts.
- Artifacts manifest as spikes in the sEMG signal at the vibration frequency and its harmonics, potentially compromising data accuracy.
- Standard sEMG processing methods may not adequately address these vibration-induced artifacts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of different sEMG processing methods on muscle activity quantification during WBV exercises.
- To compare the effectiveness of band-stop filters, band-pass filters, and spectral linear interpolation in artifact removal.
- To determine the optimal processing strategy for accurate sEMG analysis during WBV.
Main Methods:
- sEMG data were collected from participants performing squats with and without WBV.
- Artifacts were removed using three methods: band-stop filter, band-pass filter, and spectral linear interpolation.
- Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and bias were analyzed to compare methods against unfiltered sEMG during no-vibration trials.
Main Results:
- Spectral linear interpolation demonstrated the highest ICC values, indicating excellent agreement with the reference measure.
- A band-stop filter also showed good agreement, though it introduced a greater bias at higher mean sEMG values.
- A band-pass filter performed poorly unless sEMG(RMS) was corrected for bias, after which its agreement improved significantly.
Conclusions:
- Spectral linear interpolation or a band-stop filter are recommended for artifact removal in sEMG during WBV.
- If using a band-stop filter, correcting sEMG(RMS) for systematic bias is advised to enhance performance.
- Accurate muscle activity quantification during WBV requires careful selection and application of sEMG processing techniques.


