Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Percent Time in Range with Warfarin as a Performance Measure: How Long a Sampling Frame Is Needed?
Adam J Rose1, Joel I Reisman, Zayd Razouki
1Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.
Shortening the warfarin time in therapeutic range (TTR) measurement period can exclude well-controlled patients. A 4-month period provides comparable results to 6 months for site performance, making it a recommended alternative.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Pharmacy
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Warfarin remains a critical anticoagulant for millions globally.
- Percent time in therapeutic range (TTR) is a key performance metric for warfarin therapy.
- Concerns exist that TTR measurement periods may not accurately reflect performance changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of varying TTR measurement durations on performance assessment.
- To determine if shorter TTR calculation windows provide comparable site performance data.
- To identify an optimal TTR measurement period for clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 124 Department of Veterans Affairs sites over seven fiscal years (2008-2014).
- Comparison of TTR calculations using 2, 3, 4, and 6-month time segments.
- Evaluation metrics included patient retention, mean TTR, and site performance rankings.
Main Results:
- Shorter TTR windows (e.g., 2 months) selectively excluded patients with better anticoagulation control.
- Mean TTR was highest with longer periods (6 months: 65.2%) and lowest with shorter periods (2 months: 60.0%).
- 3-, 4-, and 6-month periods yielded similar results, including over 800 patients and mean TTRs between 64.9%-65.2%.
Conclusions:
- A 4-month TTR measurement period offers comparable results to a 6-month period for assessing site-level performance.
- The findings support using a 4-month period for future TTR-based performance evaluations.
- Adjusting the TTR measurement duration can improve the accuracy and responsiveness of performance monitoring.
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Influence of Elimination Half-Life on Effect Duration
Noncompartmental Analysis: Mean Residence Time
After the administration of a drug through intravenous bolus injection, the drug molecules are distributed throughout the body and remain there for varying periods. The MRT represents the average time these drug molecules stay in the...
Dosage Regimen: Multiple Oral Dosage

