Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.4K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.1K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.1K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

944
944
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.4K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrating sensory analysis and voltammetry to explore oxidative susceptibility in red wines.

Food chemistry: X·2026
Same author

A preliminary approach to increase oxidative stability in wines: the addition of sacrificial amino acids naturally occurring in wine to reduce Strecker aldehydes formation.

Food chemistry·2025
Same author

The role of polyphenols in oxygen consumption and in the accumulation of acetaldehyde and Strecker aldehydes during wine oxidation.

Food chemistry·2024
Same author

Factors That Affect the Accumulation of Strecker Aldehydes in Standardized Wines: The Importance of pH in Oxidation.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Maturation of Moristel in Different Vineyards: Amino Acid and Aroma Composition of <i>Mistelles</i> and Wines with Particular Emphasis in Strecker Aldehydes.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

An Index for Wine Acetaldehyde Reactive Potential (ARP) and Some Derived Remarks about the Accumulation of Acetaldehyde during Wine Oxidation.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K

Detection of counting pseudoerrors: What helps children accept them?

M Oliva Lago1, Purificación Rodríguez1, Ana Escudero1

  • 1Faculty of Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

The British Journal of Developmental Psychology
|November 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Children better understand counting rules when cardinal values are present. They also judge rule violations differently based on the type of rule broken, especially temporal and spatial-temporal ones.

Keywords:
cardinal valueconventional rulescountingdetection taskpseudoerrors

More Related Videos

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Mathematical Cognition
  • Child Psychology

Background:

  • Children's understanding of counting principles is crucial for mathematical development.
  • Conventional counting rules, often considered non-essential, can influence performance.
  • Investigating how children process these rules informs educational strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if cardinal values in pseudoerrors affect children's recognition of non-essential counting features.
  • To analyze how different types of violated conventional rules impact children's counting performance.
  • To explore the interplay between cardinal values and rule violation types in children's counting comprehension.

Main Methods:

  • A computer game-based detection task involving pseudoerrors was administered to 146 primary school children (grades 2-4).
  • Pseudoerrors were presented both with and without cardinal values, violating spatial, temporal, spatial-temporal, and left-to-right rules.
  • Participants were randomly assigned to conditions with or without cardinal values for the pseudoerrors.

Main Results:

  • Children more readily identified non-essential counting features as optional when cardinal values were present.
  • The type of conventional rule violated significantly influenced children's acceptance of pseudoerrors.
  • Breaches in temporal and spatial-temporal adjacency were penalized more heavily than spatial adjacency or left-to-right direction violations.

Conclusions:

  • Cardinal values aid children in discerning the flexibility of non-essential counting rules.
  • Children's evaluation of counting errors is rule-dependent, with certain rules (temporal, spatial-temporal) being more critical.
  • Findings highlight the importance of both cardinal value understanding and rule salience in early mathematical cognition.