Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Isolation, Characterization, and Total DNA Extraction to Identify Endophytic Fungi in Mycoheterotrophic Plants
Published on: May 5, 2023
Metabarcoding Analysis of Phytophthora Diversity Using Genus-Specific Primers and 454 Pyrosequencing
Maria I Prigigallo1, Ahmed Abdelfattah1, Santa O Cacciola1
1First, second, and seventh authors: Dipartimento di Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; third and fourth authors: Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi, Via S. Sofia 100, 95123 Catania, Italy; fifth author: Dipartimento di Scienze del Suolo, della Pianta e degli Alimenti, Università degli Studi Aldo Moro, Via G. Amendola 165/A, 70126, Bari, Italy; and sixth author: The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK.
454 pyrosequencing identified 25 Phytophthora phylotypes, including novel species, in nursery plant samples. This metabarcoding method offers higher resolution than Sanger sequencing for studying Phytophthora diversity.
Area of Science:
- Plant Pathology
- Molecular Ecology
- Microbial Genetics
Background:
- Phytophthora species are significant plant pathogens causing substantial agricultural losses.
- Accurate identification and diversity assessment of Phytophthora are crucial for effective disease management.
- Previous methods like cloning/Sanger sequencing have limitations in resolution and throughput.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a metabarcoding approach using genus-specific primers and 454 pyrosequencing for detecting Phytophthora genetic diversity.
- To compare the efficacy of 454 pyrosequencing with cloning/Sanger sequencing for Phytophthora phylotype identification.
- To investigate the diversity of Phytophthora spp. in soil and root samples from nurseries.
Main Methods:
- Utilized genus-specific primers and 454 pyrosequencing for metabarcoding analysis.
- Analyzed soil and root samples from eight nurseries.
- Compared results with cloning/Sanger sequencing and GenBank database.
Main Results:
- Detected 25 Phytophthora phylotypes across seven clades, significantly higher resolution than cloning/Sanger sequencing.
- Identified 11 phylotypes, including known species and five putative new species, exclusively via 454 pyrosequencing.
- Discovered 18 novel records of a specific phylotype not found by the traditional method.
Conclusions:
- 454 pyrosequencing is a powerful and reliable tool for studying Phytophthora diversity.
- The method provides higher resolution and detects more phylotypes, including novel ones, compared to cloning/Sanger sequencing.
- Careful analysis of raw reads and sequence types is essential for accurate results.
More Related Videos
09:55Exploring the Root Microbiome: Extracting Bacterial Community Data from the Soil, Rhizosphere, and Root Endosphere
Published on: May 2, 2018
12:11Identification of Metabolically Active Bacteria in the Gut of the Generalist Spodoptera littoralis via DNA Stable Isotope Probing Using 13C-Glucose
Published on: November 13, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....