Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones
Published on: February 27, 2021
Multiple Cis-acting elements modulate programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting in Pea enation mosaic virus
1Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting (-1 PRF) is essential for Umbravirus replication. Specific RNA structures downstream of the recoding site precisely regulate this frameshifting efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Virology
- RNA Structure and Function
Background:
- Programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting (-1 PRF) is a key mechanism for viral protein synthesis.
- The precise regulation of -1 PRF by downstream cis-elements remains poorly understood.
- Pea enation mosaic virus (PEMV) utilizes -1 PRF for RNA polymerase expression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the role of downstream RNA structures in regulating -1 PRF in Umbraviruses.
- To investigate the contribution of the Recoding Stimulatory Element (RSE) and its substructures to frameshifting efficiency.
- To understand how RNA secondary and tertiary structures influence frameshifting levels.
Main Methods:
- Comparative sequence analysis to identify conserved RNA structures.
- Site-directed mutagenesis to alter RSE and lower stem (LS) sequences.
- SHAPE probing to assess RNA structure and conformational changes.
- Ribosomal frameshifting assays to quantify -1 PRF efficiency.
Main Results:
- Phylogenetically conserved hairpins, including the RSE, are crucial for efficient -1 PRF.
- Mutations in the RSE and LS significantly impact frameshifting levels.
- The LS structure can adopt alternative conformations, influencing frameshifting.
- Long-distance RNA-RNA interactions are less critical when LS structure is stabilized.
- Deletion of an upstream hairpin dramatically increases frameshifting in the absence of the RSE.
Conclusions:
- The RSE and its associated structures play a critical role in modulating -1 PRF efficiency.
- RNA secondary structure stability and conformational flexibility are key regulatory factors.
- Mechanisms may exist to suppress frameshifting when the RSE is not optimally structured.
- Understanding these regulatory elements is vital for viral translation control.
More Related Videos
08:58In Vitro Transcribed RNA-based Luciferase Reporter Assay to Study Translation Regulation in Poxvirus-infected Cells
Published on: May 1, 2019
09:13Using Reverse Genetics to Manipulate the NSs Gene of the Rift Valley Fever Virus MP-12 Strain to Improve Vaccine Safety and Efficacy
Published on: November 1, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Leaky Scanning
Subviral Agents
Initiation of Translation
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Point and Frameshift Mutations
Ribozymes
Ribozymes can...
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay