Are Doses and Schedules of Small-Molecule Targeted Anticancer Drugs Recommended by Phase I Studies Realistic?

Desamparados Roda1, Begoña Jimenez1, Udai Banerji2

  • 1The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Insights

Phase I trials often underestimate toxicity for small molecule molecularly targeted agents (SM-MTA) in cancer. Subsequent phase III trials reveal higher adverse events, necessitating dose adjustments and highlighting the need for careful tolerability assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Tolerability of molecularly targeted agents (MTA) is crucial for cancer therapeutics.
  • Phase I trials determine initial safety and dosing, but real-world efficacy in larger populations requires further evaluation.
  • Small molecule MTAs (SM-MTA) and monoclonal antibody MTAs (MA-MTA) represent key classes of targeted cancer drugs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the realism of phase I trial dose and schedule recommendations for MTAs in larger patient cohorts.
  • To systematically review the safety profile of SM-MTA and MA-MTA approved by the FDA over the past 12 years.
  • To compare the incidence of toxicity between SM-MTA and MA-MTA in phase III trials.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of safety data from phase III clinical trials for FDA-approved SM-MTA and MA-MTA.
  • Analysis of reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events and dose modifications.
  • Comparison of toxicity data for single-agent MTAs versus combination therapies.

Main Results:

  • SM-MTA showed a significantly higher percentage of grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared to MA-MTA in phase III trials (40% vs. 27%).
  • Forty-five percent of patients on SM-MTA required dose modifications due to toxicity in phase III trials, with only 9% discontinuing the drug.
  • Combinations of SM-MTA with other agents resulted in higher grade 3-4 toxicity (64%) compared to single-agent SM-MTA (37%).

Conclusions:

  • Phase I studies tend to underestimate the toxicity of SM-MTA when recommending doses for phase II and III trials.
  • The observed toxicity in phase III trials suggests that current dose recommendations may not be fully realistic for broader patient populations.
  • Increased focus on tolerability is needed, especially with the growing use of SM-MTA combinations in cancer treatment.

Related Concept Videos

Dosage Regimen: Individualization01:24

Dosage Regimen: Individualization

Individualization in dosing regimens is the customization of medication doses for individual patients. Its necessity arises from the goal of maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks. This approach is pivotal because human responses to drugs can vary widely; what is effective for one person may be inadequate or excessive for another. Interpatient (intersubject) variability refers to differences in drug responses between individuals, while intrapatient (intrasubject) variability...
280
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
511
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses01:25

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...
357
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches01:28

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...
460
Drug Dosage Regimen: Overview01:15

Drug Dosage Regimen: Overview

A drug dosage regimen describes the specific instructions and schedule for administering a drug to a patient. It considers factors such as drug dosage, frequency, route of administration, and duration of treatment. Designing an appropriate dosage regimen for a patient aims to achieve a target drug concentration at the site of action.
Typically, the starting dose and dosing interval are guided by the manufacturer's recommendations based on clinical trials conducted during and after drug...
4.7K
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters01:01

Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

It is not uncommon for complete drug pharmacokinetic profiles to remain elusive in pharmacokinetics. This necessitates certain educated assumptions by pharmacokineticists to determine appropriate dosage regimens without comprehensive pharmacokinetic data from animal or human studies. One prevalent assumption is setting the bioavailability factor, denoted as F, to 1 or 100%. This assumption caters to the scenario where a drug doesn't achieve full systemic absorption, resulting in the patient...
255