Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sharpened Visual Memory Representations Are Reflected in Inferotemporal Cortex.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Resolving a paradox about how vision is transformed into familiarity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Neurons of Macaque Frontal Eye Field Signal Reward-Related Surprise.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Independent repetition suppression in macaque area V2 and inferotemporal cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2022
Same author

Contribution of individual features to repetition suppression in macaque inferotemporal cortex.

Journal of neurophysiology·2022
Same author

Republished:Aspiration catheter failure leading to carotid-cavernous fistula during stroke thrombectomy.

Journal of neurointerventional surgery·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Prediction suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex depends on the conditional probability between images.

Suchitra Ramachandran1, Travis Meyer2, Carl R Olson3

  • 1Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and suchitra@andrew.cmu.edu.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|November 20, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Neural prediction suppression in monkeys depends on image contingency, not just co-occurrence. This finding reveals how the brain learns predictive relationships between visual stimuli.

Keywords:
inferotemporalplasticitypredictionvision

More Related Videos

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.8K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.8K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • Neurons in area TE of the inferotemporal cortex exhibit prediction suppression when monkeys view images in a fixed sequence.
  • Prediction suppression is a phenomenon where a repeated trailing image elicits a weaker neural response.
  • This suppression may depend on image contiguity (co-occurrence) or contingency (correlation).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate whether prediction suppression relies on image contiguity or contingency.
  • To investigate the role of joint probability (P(A,B)) versus conditional probabilities (P(A|B), P(B|A)) in prediction suppression.

Main Methods:

  • Monkeys were trained on image sequences under regimens that kept joint probability constant but varied conditional probabilities.
  • Prediction suppression was measured during subsequent testing after the training period.
  • Statistical measures like joint probability P(A,B) and conditional probabilities P(A|B) and P(B|A) were used.

Main Results:

  • Reducing either P(A|B) or P(B|A) during training significantly attenuated prediction suppression.
  • The degree of prediction suppression correlated with the strength of the predictive relationship between images.

Conclusions:

  • Prediction suppression is dependent on the contingency between images, reflecting learned predictive relationships.
  • Contiguity alone (co-occurrence) is insufficient to induce robust prediction suppression.
  • This suggests that the brain actively learns and relies on probabilistic predictive information in visual sequences.