Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Relativistic Density Functional Calculations of Hyperfine Coupling with Variational versus Perturbational Treatment
Prakash Verma1, Jochen Autschbach1
1Department of Chemistry, University at Buffalo, State University of New York , Buffalo, New York 14260-3000.
Abstract:
Different approaches are compared for relativistic density functional theory (DFT) and Hartree-Fock (HF) calculations of electron-nucleus hyperfine coupling (HFC) in molecules with light atoms, in transition metal complexes, and in selected actinide halide complexes with a formal metal 5f(1) configuration. The comparison includes hybrid density functionals with range-separated exchange. Within the variationally stable zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA) relativistic framework, the HFC is obtained (i) with a linear response (LR) method where spin-orbit (SO) coupling is treated as a linear perturbation, (ii) with a spin-polarized approach closely related to a DFT method for calculating magnetic anisotropy (MA) previously devised by van Wüllen et al. where SO coupling is included variationally, (iii) with a quasi-restricted variational SO method previously devised by van Lenthe, van der Avoird, and Wormer (LWA). The MA and LWA approaches for HFC calculations were implemented in the open-source NWChem quantum chemistry package as part of this study. The methodology extends recent implementations for calculations of electronic g-factors (J. Chem. Theor. Comput.2013, 9, 1052). The impact of electron correlation (DFT vs HF) and DFT delocalization errors, the effects of spin-polarization, the importance of treating spin-orbit coupling beyond first-order, and the magnitude of finite-nucleus effects, are investigated. Similar to calculations of g-factors, the MA approach in conjunction with hybrid functionals performs reasonably well for theoretical predictions of HFC in a wide range of scenarios.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
12:11Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Radii and Effective Nuclear Charge
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...