Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
19:15
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Preterm birth prevention: evaluation of a prospective controlled randomized trial
E Mueller-Heubach1, D Reddick, B Barnett
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital, PA 15213.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|May 1, 1989
Summary
Healthcare providers
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Preterm birth remains a significant challenge in maternal healthcare.
- Identifying and managing high-risk pregnancies is crucial for improving outcomes.
- Previous interventions have shown variable success in preventing preterm birth.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured intervention program for preventing preterm birth in indigent patients.
- To assess the impact of provider education and patient instruction on preterm birth rates.
Main Methods:
- A 3-year study involving over 5,000 indigent patients at risk for preterm birth.
- Randomization of high-risk patients into a control group and an intervention group.
- Intervention group received weekly cervical exams and patient/provider education on preterm labor signs.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in preterm birth rates between the control and intervention groups.
- Healthcare providers, convinced by early results, extended precautions to all patients, confounding the study design.
- Preterm birth rates significantly decreased from 13.7% to 9.3% after the first year, and disparities between private and indigent patients vanished.
Conclusions:
- While the randomized intervention did not show a statistically significant effect, the study highlights the impact of widespread adoption of preventive measures by healthcare providers.
- Universal application of preterm birth precautions, irrespective of study design, led to a substantial reduction in preterm births and improved equity.
- Further research is needed to refine targeted interventions while acknowledging the power of broad clinical practice changes.
Related Concept Videos
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
01:30Preventive Healthcare Services
Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:
01:26Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...