Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 30, 2026

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 in Mice
Vidya Ramakrishnan1, Qi Joy Yang1, Holly P Quach1
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Q.J.Y., H.P.Q., E.C.Y.C., K.S.P.); and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, New York (V.R., Y.C., D.E.M.).
Abstract:
1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3] concentrations are regulated by renal CYP27B1 for synthesis and CYP24A1 for degradation. Published plasma and tissue 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations and mRNA fold change expression of Cyp24a1 and Cyp27b1 following repetitive i.p. injections to C57BL/6 mice (2.5 μg × kg(-1) every 2 days for 4 doses) were fitted with a minimal and full physiologically-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models (PBPK-PD). The minimal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic linked model (mPBPK-PD) related Cyp24a1 mRNA fold changes to linear changes in tissue/tissue baseline 1,25(OH)2D3 concentration ratios, whereas the full physiologically-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model (PBPK-PD) related measured tissue Cyp24a1 and Cyp27b1 fold changes to tissue 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations with indirect response, sigmoidal maximal stimulatory effect/maximal inhibitory effect functions. Moreover, the intestinal segregated flow model (SFM) that describes a low and partial intestinal (blood/plasma) flow to enterocytes was nested within both models for comparison with the traditional model for intestine (TM) where the entire flow perfuses the intestine. Both the mPBPK(SFM)-PD and full PBPK(SFM)-PD models described the i.p. plasma and tissue 1,25(OH)2D3 concentrations and fold changes in mRNA expression significantly better than the TM counterparts with F test comparisons. The full PBPK(SFM)-PD fits showed estimates with good precision (lower percentage of coefficient of variation), and the model was more robust in predicting data from escalating i.v. doses (2, 60, and 120 pmol) and the rebound in 1,25(OH)2D3 tissue concentrations after dosing termination. The full PBPK(SFM)-PD model performed the best among the tested models for describing the complex pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interplay among Cyp27b1, Cyp24a1, and 1,25(OH)2D3.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Physiological Models

