Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Isotopic Effect in Double Proton Transfer Process of Porphycene Investigated by Enhanced QM/MM Method
Published on: July 19, 2019
Proton Affinity Calculations with High Level Methods
1inGAP Center for Research Based Innovation, Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo , Blindern, P.O. Box 1033, 0315, Oslo, Norway.
This study accurately computed proton affinities for various organic molecules using advanced computational methods. Findings reveal discrepancies in existing literature values for propene and methylbenzenes, highlighting the need for refined data.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Physical Chemistry
Background:
- Proton affinity is a fundamental chemical property influencing molecular interactions and reactivity.
- Accurate proton affinity data is crucial for various chemical applications, including reaction mechanism elucidation and drug design.
- Existing literature values for some compounds may contain inaccuracies, necessitating re-evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To accurately calculate proton affinities for a range of organic compounds, from small molecules to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
- To compare the performance of several high-accuracy computational methods in determining proton affinities.
- To identify and correct potential inaccuracies in currently accepted literature proton affinity values.
Main Methods:
- High-accuracy computational chemistry methods were employed, including W1BD, G4, G3B3, CBS-QB3, and M06-2X.
- Calculations covered a spectrum of molecules, from simple reference compounds to methylbenzenes, naphthalene, and anthracene.
- Computed proton affinities were rigorously compared against established reference values.
Main Results:
- Computed proton affinities generally show excellent agreement with accepted reference values, with notable exceptions.
- Literature values for propene and methylbenzenes appear to be overestimated by 6-7 kJ/mol and 4-5 kJ/mol, respectively.
- The G4 and G3B3 methods demonstrated good agreement with the high-level W1BD method.
- The CBS-QB3 method consistently underestimated proton affinities, with errors increasing for larger molecules.
- The M06-2X functional showed significant deviations for small molecules like CO and ketene but high accuracy for methylbenzenes.
Conclusions:
- The study provides highly accurate proton affinity data, refining existing literature values for specific compounds.
- Computational methods exhibit varying degrees of accuracy, with G4 and G3B3 showing robust performance.
- The findings underscore the importance of employing appropriate computational tools for reliable chemical property determination.
Related Concept Videos
Proton (¹H) NMR: Chemical Shift
Absorption signals of all the protium nuclei...
Atomic Radii and Effective Nuclear Charge
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
Polyprotic Acids
Electron Affinity
Strong Acid and Base Solutions

