Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

First Impression01:09

First Impression

362
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
362
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

352
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
352
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.6K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.6K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.1K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motion perception in touch: resolving contradictory findings by varying probabilities of different trial types.

Psychological research·2023
Same author

People with higher autistic traits show stronger binding for color-shape associations.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Food neophobia and its association with sociodemographic factors and food preferences among Bangladeshi university students: Evidence from a cross-sectional study.

Heliyon·2023
Same author

Relishing the taste of food.

Nature food·2023
Same author

Prunus persica in science, literature and art.

Nature food·2023
Same author

Why pair food and drink.

Nature food·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Spatial negative priming: In touch, it's all about location.

Ann-Katrin Wesslein1,2, Charles Spence3, Frank Mast4,3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany. wesslein@uni-trier.de.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|November 22, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Spatial negative priming (SNP) is a cognitive phenomenon where responses are slower to stimuli from previously ignored locations. This study reveals that tactile SNP relies more on location features, unlike vision and audition, suggesting modality-specific processing.

Keywords:
Response inhibitionSpatial attentionSpatial negative primingTouch

More Related Videos

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.5K
Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.5K
Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
07:04

Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection

Published on: March 10, 2021

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • Spatial negative priming (SNP) is observed across visual, auditory, and tactile modalities.
  • Existing research indicates differing cognitive mechanisms for SNP in vision (response inhibition) and audition (feature mismatch).
  • The underlying mechanisms of tactile SNP have remained unclear, with prior work ruling out feature mismatch.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cognitive locus of spatial negative priming (SNP) in the tactile sensory modality.
  • To compare the mechanisms of tactile SNP with those previously identified in vision and audition.
  • To determine if tactile SNP is influenced by location, response, or stimulus features.

Main Methods:

  • The study employed behavioral experiments to measure response times in tactile tasks.
  • Participants were exposed to stimuli from previously ignored or unstimulated locations.
  • Analysis focused on how location, response, and stimulus features modulated the SNP effect in touch.

Main Results:

  • Tactile SNP was found to be significantly more sensitive to location features compared to vision and audition.
  • Unlike auditory SNP (feature mismatch) and visual SNP (response inhibition), tactile SNP's primary driver appears to be spatial location.
  • These findings indicate that the processing of spatial distractor information is modality-specific.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial negative priming (SNP) is mediated by distinct cognitive processes across sensory modalities.
  • Tactile SNP is uniquely influenced by the spatial properties of ignored locations.
  • The results suggest that the brain processes spatial information from distractors in a modality-specific manner.