Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Actuarial Approach

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

Robbers Cave

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...

Hazard Rate

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Merger's closed. What's next? Use this eight-step checklist to make sure the merger achieves its promise.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·2013

Same author

The board's financial oversight responsibilities.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·2011

Same author

Striking a balance.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·2010

Same author

Health reform hands boards big responsibilities.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·2010

Same author

Having the general counsel's back.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·2009

Same author

The not-for-profit investment committee in tough times.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2009

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Burwell, and Enterprise Risk.

Michael W Peregrine

Trustee : the Journal for Hospital Governing Boards

|November 24, 2015

Summary

Examining the board's response to King v. Burwell provides critical insights into corporate risk oversight effectiveness. This analysis highlights how governance structures manage significant legal and financial challenges.

Area of Science:

Health policy analysis
Corporate governance research

Background:

The King v. Burwell Supreme Court case presented significant legal and financial risks.
Effective board oversight is crucial for navigating complex healthcare policy challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze how corporate boards addressed the risks associated with the King v. Burwell case.
To evaluate the role of board risk oversight in managing major policy uncertainties.

Main Methods:

Review of board meeting minutes and corporate filings.
Analysis of governance structures and decision-making processes.

Main Results:

The board's actions demonstrated specific strategies for risk mitigation.
Insights into the board's engagement with external legal and policy experts.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

The board's approach to King v. Burwell serves as a case study for effective risk oversight.
Understanding these mechanisms can inform future corporate responses to policy shifts.