Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Staff and patient views on intentional rounding
Abstract:
Intentional rounding is controversial, with growing evidence questioning its effectiveness. This article describes the planning stage of a quality improvement project to develop rounding undertaken by a London trust. Through a survey, interviews, observations and an audit, it was found that neither patients nor staff believed intentional rounding was effective in improving patient care. The system was not carried out as indicated by trust policy, and patients interviewed questioned the need for rounding. It is suggested that nurses and patients work together to develop a new model of inpatient care provision, with emphasis placed on an effective nurse-patient relationship.
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:

