Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insights into the Neural Mechanisms Supporting Cognitive Stability and Flexibility from Human Intracranial Electroencephalography.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Visual working memory for real-world objects is resistant to visual but vulnerable to semantic interference.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

The puzzle of profitless pre-cues.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

When forewarned is not forearmed: No evidence for cue-based proactive control in the spatial Stroop task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Obligatory coactive processing of color and luminance challenges strategic modulation by predictiveness.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Domain-specific cognitive flexibility: Shift-readiness adaptations for task- and attention-switching are non-transferrable.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

17.0K

Distractor-relevance determines whether task-switching enhances or impairs distractor memory.

Yu-Chin Chiu1, Tobias Egner1

  • 1Center for Cognitive Neuroscience.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|November 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Task-switching research shows that memory for distractors improves when stimuli are intermittently irrelevant. However, this effect reverses for always-irrelevant stimuli, suggesting task-set inertia, not an open gate, drives this memory enhancement.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

17.0K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Task-switching can lead to reduced memory selectivity, with enhanced distractor memory and impaired target memory on switch trials.
  • One theory suggests task-switching opens a "gate" to working memory, increasing distraction.
  • Prior studies confounded distractors with previously relevant stimuli, leaving alternative explanations like "task-set inertia" unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between the "open-gate" and "task-set inertia" explanations for switch-enhanced distractor memory.
  • To investigate the role of stimulus relevance during task-switching on memory.
  • To determine if switch-enhanced distractor memory persists for truly irrelevant stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a task-switching paradigm with two conditions: intermittently irrelevant distractors and always task-irrelevant distractors.
  • Incidental memory for distractor stimuli was assessed in both conditions.
  • Behavioral data were analyzed to compare memory performance between switch and repeat trials.

Main Results:

  • Switch-enhanced distractor memory was replicated in the intermittently irrelevant distractor condition.
  • This effect was reversed in the always task-irrelevant distractor condition, showing impaired distractor memory on switch trials.
  • Memory for truly task-irrelevant stimuli was not enhanced by task-switching.

Conclusions:

  • The findings contradict the "open-gate" account of task-switching.
  • Results support the "task-set inertia" hypothesis, indicating that residual attention to previously relevant stimuli contributes to enhanced distractor memory.
  • Switch-enhanced distractor memory is dependent on the stimuli being at least intermittently relevant to the task set.