Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Labeling of Breast Cancer Patient-derived Xenografts with Traceable Reporters for Tumor Growth and Metastasis Studies
Published on: November 30, 2016
Patient-reported outcomes for US oncology labeling: review and discussion of score interpretation and analysis
Alan Shields1, Cheryl Coon2, Yanni Hao3
1a Endpoint Development & Outcomes Assessment, Adelphi Values , Boston , MA , USA.
Abstract:
This paper describes ways to approach the conceptual and practical challenges associated with interpreting the clinical meaning of scores produced by patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires, particularly when used to inform efficacy decisions for regulatory approval for oncology products. Score interpretation estimates are not inherent to PRO questionnaires per se, instead, vary dependent upon sample and study design characteristics. Scores from PRO measures can be interpreted at the individual and group level, and each carries its own set of statistics for evaluating differences. Oncology researchers have a variety of methods and data analytic strategies available to support their score interpretation needs, which should be considered in the context of their a priori knowledge of the target patient population, the hypothesized effects of treatment, the study design and assessment schedule, and the inferences and decisions to be made from the PRO data.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
