Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Biological Samples Preparation for Speciation at Cryogenic Temperature using High-Resolution X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Published on: May 27, 2022
Cancer chemoprevention research with selenium in the post-SELECT era: Promises and challenges
Junxuan Lü1, Jinhui Zhang1, Cheng Jiang1
1a Department of Biomedical Sciences , School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , Amarillo , Texas , USA.
Abstract:
The negative efficacy outcomes of double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III human clinical trials with selenomethionine (SeMet) and SeMet-rich selenized-yeast (Se-yeast) for prostate cancer prevention and Se-yeast for prevention of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in North America lead to rejection of SeMet/Se-yeast for cancer prevention in Se-adequate populations. We identify 2 major lessons from the outcomes of these trials: 1) the antioxidant hypothesis was tested in wrong subjects or patient populations, and 2) the selection of Se agents was not supported by cell culture and preclinical animal efficacy data as is common in drug development. We propose that next-generation forms of Se (next-gen Se), such as methylselenol precursors, offer biologically appropriate approaches for cancer chemoprevention but these are faced with formidable challenges. Solid mechanism-based preclinical efficacy assessments and comprehensive safety studies with next-gen Se will be essential to revitalize the idea of cancer chemoprevention with Se in the post-SELECT era. We advocate smaller mechanism-driven Phase I/II trials with these next-gen Se to guide and justify future decisions for definitive Phase III chemoprevention efficacy trials.
Insights
Previous cancer prevention trials using selenomethionine (SeMet) and selenized yeast failed. Future research should focus on next-generation selenium (Se) forms and mechanism-based preclinical studies for effective cancer chemoprevention.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nutritional Biochemistry
- Chemoprevention Research
Background:
- Phase III trials of selenomethionine (SeMet) and SeMet-rich selenized yeast (Se-yeast) for prostate cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prevention showed negative efficacy outcomes in North America.
- These results led to the rejection of SeMet/Se-yeast for cancer prevention in selenium-adequate populations, highlighting issues with trial design and agent selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the lessons learned from failed selenium-based cancer chemoprevention trials.
- To propose next-generation selenium (Se) forms as potentially more effective agents for cancer chemoprevention.
- To outline the necessary steps for future research and development of selenium chemoprevention strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of outcomes from Phase III clinical trials involving SeMet and Se-yeast.
- Identification of key deficiencies in the "antioxidant hypothesis" application and agent selection processes.
- Proposal of a new research paradigm focusing on mechanism-based preclinical assessments and next-generation Se agents.
Main Results:
- The "antioxidant hypothesis" for cancer prevention was likely tested in inappropriate patient populations.
- The selection of SeMet and Se-yeast lacked sufficient preclinical efficacy validation, a standard practice in drug development.
- Next-generation Se forms, like methylselenol precursors, present a promising but challenging avenue for cancer chemoprevention.
Conclusions:
- Selenium (Se) chemoprevention requires a paradigm shift, moving beyond the "antioxidant hypothesis" in Se-adequate populations.
- Next-generation Se agents necessitate robust, mechanism-based preclinical efficacy and safety evaluations before human trials.
- Smaller, mechanism-driven Phase I/II trials are crucial to guide future definitive Phase III chemoprevention studies with novel Se compounds.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Prevention
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies

