Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026
Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Management of Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures With the SIGN Intramedullary Nail in 3 Developing Countries
Kyle R Stephens1, Faseeh Shahab, Daniel Galat
1*Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Clinton Township, MI; †Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, Pakistan; ‡Tenwek Hospital, Bomet, Kenya; §Soddo Christian Hospital, Soddo, Ethiopia; ‖Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan; ¶Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabiliation University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; **Resurgens Orthopaedics, Marietta, GA; and ††SIGN Fracture Care International.
Objectives:
To evaluate the effectiveness of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) intramedullary (IM) nail in distal tibial metaphyseal fractures.
Design:
Retrospective Case Series.
Setting:
Three Level I trauma centers in 3 different developing countries from 2009 to 2013.
Patient/Participants:
One hundred sixty patients with 162 distal tibial metaphyseal fractures (AO/OTA 43-A).
Intervention:
SIGN IM nailing was performed using hand reaming and without the use of an image intensifier.
Main Outcome Measurements:
The primary outcome measures were the rate of union and complications. The secondary outcome measures were the effect of open fractures on outcomes, effectiveness and safety of open reduction of closed fractures, and risk factors for the development of malalignment and possible solutions.
Results:
The average age of patients was 35.3 years. Seventy-nine percent were male. Sixty percent of the fractures were closed. The mean time to surgery was 4.1 days. Fracture union occurred in 97.3% of fractures with an average time to union of 105 days. Open reduction of closed fractures was performed in 51 fractures. Nonunion occurred in 3 patients (1.8%). Acceptable alignment (<5 degrees deformity) was found in 134 fractures (83%). Infection occurred in 14 patients (8.6%). Revision surgery was required in 10 fractures (6.2%).
Conclusions:
In developing settings, distal metaphyseal tibial fractures can be managed successfully with the SIGN IM nail. There is an increased risk for complications (P = 0.001) and infection (P = 0.0004) in open fractures. Open reduction of closed distal tibia fractures is safe and effective. Malalignment can be improved with fibula stabilization but indications remain unclear. For surgeons interested in international mission work, the SIGN IM nail is an effective tool in managing distal tibial fractures.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
More Related Videos
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
11:21Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
