Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adolescent contraception: nonhormonal methods.

J W Kulig1

  • 1Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Pediatric Clinics of North America
|June 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Searching for the Magic Johnson effect: AIDS, adolescents, and celebrity disclosure.

Adolescence·1996
Same author

Health and health needs of homeless and runaway youth. A position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·1992
Same author

Streptococcal pyomyositis in two adolescent patients.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal·1992
Same author

Adolescent contraception: an update.

Pediatrics·1985
Same author

Teenagers, physicians, and the law in New England.

Journal of adolescent health care : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·1985
Same author

Developmental changes in auditory temporal perception.

Child development·1984

Barrier methods offer adolescents protection against pregnancy and STDs. Combining condoms with spermicides or using female condoms provides optimal protection, while other methods have specific suitability requirements.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Adolescent Medicine
  • Contraception

Background:

  • Adolescents require effective contraception for pregnancy and STD prevention.
  • Current contraceptive methods have varying levels of efficacy, acceptability, and accessibility for this demographic.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the advantages, disadvantages, and costs of various contraceptive methods for adolescents.
  • To identify optimal contraceptive strategies for adolescent populations.

Main Methods:

  • Review and comparison of barrier methods, hormonal methods, intrauterine devices (IUDs), periodic abstinence, and sterilization.
  • Analysis of method-specific protection against pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

Main Results:

Keywords:
Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdolescentsAge FactorsAmericasBarrier MethodsCervical CapCondomContraceptionContraceptive AgentsContraceptive MethodsContraceptive Methods ChosenContraceptive UsageDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesDiseasesFamily PlanningHiv InfectionsIudNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaOral ContraceptivesPopulationPopulation CharacteristicsSpermicidal Contraceptive AgentsSterilization, SexualUnited StatesVaginal Barrier MethodsVaginal DiaphragmVaginal SpongeViral DiseasesYouth

Related Experiment Videos

  • Barrier methods, particularly condoms used with spermicides or female condoms, offer dual protection against pregnancy and STDs.
  • Diaphragms, cervical caps, and vaginal sponges are suitable for motivated adolescents, with sponges offering advantages over fitting requirements.
  • Vaginal spermicides alone are less effective; IUDs carry increased pelvic infection risk for adolescents; periodic abstinence and sterilization have limited applicability.

Conclusions:

  • Innovative approaches are needed to improve the availability and acceptability of contraceptive methods for adolescents.
  • Combination methods, such as condoms with spermicides, provide the most effective protection.
  • Method selection should consider adolescent education, motivation, and comfort with use.