Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.5K

An Additive Manufacturing Test Artifact.

Shawn Moylan1, John Slotwinski2, April Cooke3

  • 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
|November 25, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Infant with Known Dandy-Walker Malformation and Poor Feeding Found to Have Additional Diagnosis.

AJP reports·2025
Same author

Uncertainty of particle size measurements using dynamic image analysis<sup>☆</sup>.

CIRP annals ... manufacturing technology·2024
Same author

Assessing the influence of non-uniform gas speed on the melt pool depth in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.

Rapid prototyping journal·2024
Same author

Predictive modeling and optimization of multi-track processing for laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625.

Additive manufacturing·2024
Same author

Influence of scan strategy and process parameters on microstructure and its optimization in additively manufactured nickel alloy 625 via laser powder bed fusion.

The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology·2023
Same author

Data related to the effect of specimen geometry and orientation on tensile properties of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by electron beam powder bed fusion.

Data in brief·2021
Same journal

Precise Numerical Differentiation of Thermodynamic Functions with Multicomplex Variables.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Characterization of 3-Dimensional Printing and Casting Materials for use in Computed Tomography and X-ray Imaging Phantoms.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

On The Quotient of a Centralized and a Non-centralized Complex Gaussian Random Variable.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Fast Methods for Finding Multiple Effective Influencers in Real Networks.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Disinfection of Respirators with Ultraviolet Radiation.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

DNA Origami Design: A How-To Tutorial.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
See all related articles

A new test artifact standardizes additive manufacturing (AM) system performance evaluation. This tool helps identify and fix AM system errors for improved manufacturing quality and reliability.

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Manufacturing Engineering
  • Metrology

Background:

  • Additive Manufacturing (AM) systems require standardized performance evaluation methods.
  • Existing AM test artifacts lack comprehensive characterization capabilities.
  • Machining test artifact experience informed the design of a novel AM artifact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a new test artifact for evaluating additive manufacturing (AM) system performance.
  • To enable detailed characterization of AM system capabilities and limitations.
  • To facilitate AM system improvement by linking errors to specific sources.

Main Methods:

  • Design of a novel test artifact based on prior research and machining experience.
  • Fabrication of the test artifact using multiple AM technologies and materials.
Keywords:
3D printingadditive manufacturingbenchmarkingperformance evaluationtest artifact

More Related Videos

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing
09:39

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Published on: June 28, 2024

1.8K
Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components
08:43

Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components

Published on: January 11, 2019

18.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.5K
Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing
09:39

Characterizing Dissipative Elastic Metamaterials Produced by Additive Manufacturing

Published on: June 28, 2024

1.8K
Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components
08:43

Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components

Published on: January 11, 2019

18.3K
  • Analysis of measurement results from various builds to demonstrate artifact utility.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed test artifact successfully characterized AM system performance across different builds.
    • Specific measurement results were linked to identifiable sources of error within AM systems.
    • Demonstrated the artifact's capability to guide AM system improvements.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed test artifact provides a robust method for AM system standardization and evaluation.
    • The artifact enables targeted improvements in AM processes by identifying error origins.
    • This approach contributes to enhanced quality control and reliability in additive manufacturing.