Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Measurement of T Cell Alloreactivity Using Imaging Flow Cytometry
Published on: April 19, 2017
2013 Banff Criteria for Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Assessment in a Real-Life Setting
S A De Serres1, R Noël1, I Côté1
1Transplantation Unit, Renal Division, Department of Medicine, University Health Center of Quebec, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
The 2013 Banff classification criteria for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) identify more patients and are more strongly associated with graft failure or kidney function decline than the 2007 criteria.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Immunology
- Pathology
Background:
- The Banff classification provides criteria for diagnosing kidney transplant rejection.
- Recent updates in the 2013 Banff classification for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAABMR) have altered diagnostic thresholds.
- The clinical significance of these changes requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 2007 and 2013 Banff criteria for CAABMR.
- To assess the association of these criteria with clinical outcomes, specifically death-censored graft failure or doubling of serum creatinine.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 123 kidney transplant recipients meeting morphologic criteria for chronic tissue injury.
- Comparison of patient classification using 2007 and 2013 Banff criteria.
- Cox proportional hazards modeling to evaluate association with graft failure or creatinine doubling.
Main Results:
- The 2013 criteria identified a higher proportion of patients (36%) compared to the 2007 criteria (18%).
- A 2013 diagnosis of CAABMR was significantly associated with adverse graft outcomes (aHR 2.5), while the 2007 diagnosis was not (aHR 1.6).
- The C4d component of the 2013 criteria, not glomerulitis or peritubular capillaritis, was significantly associated with outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The 2013 Banff classification criteria for CAABMR improve the identification of patients at risk for graft failure.
- The updated C4d threshold in the 2013 criteria is a key driver of improved outcome prediction.
- Further research is needed to clarify the role of other components in the 2013 criteria.
More Related Videos
18:48In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of T, B and Myeloid Cells Suppressive Activity and Humoral Responses from Transplant Recipients
Published on: August 12, 2017
09:00TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management