Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Putting "peer" into PRO.

R P Carroll

    Texas Medicine
    |June 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This article reviews Medicare peer review in Texas, highlighting state-specific challenges and solutions developed by the Texas Medical Association Physician-Patient Advocacy Committee. It emphasizes how physician involvement in organized medicine can drive impactful change.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies on graft function and survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients.

    HLA·2024
    Same author

    Development of de novo HLA donor specific antibodies (HLA-DSA), HLA antibodies (HLA-Ab) and allograft rejection post blood transfusion in kidney transplant recipients.

    Human immunology·2020
    Same author

    BK virus encoded microRNAs are present in blood of renal transplant recipients with BK viral nephropathy.

    American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2014
    Same author

    Skin cancer surveillance in renal transplant recipients: re-evaluation of U.K. practice and comparison with Australian experience.

    The British journal of dermatology·2008
    Same author

    Dermatochalasis and dry eye.

    American journal of ophthalmology·1993
    Same author

    Tarsal strip procedure.

    Ophthalmic surgery·1992
    Same journal

    Commentary: This Is Not a Drill.

    Texas medicine·2021
    Same journal

    Healthy Determination: Texas Physicians are Finding Better Ways to Address Their Patients' Social Determinants of Health.

    Texas medicine·2021
    Same journal

    Going Local: Accountable Health Organizations Could Help Combat Social Disparities at the Local Level.

    Texas medicine·2021
    Same journal

    Data Driven: Medicaid's Inspector General Focuses on Fraud Prevention, Not Just Prosecution.

    Texas medicine·2021
    Same journal

    Talk to Patients About: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

    Texas medicine·2021
    Same journal

    Obstacles to Clear.

    Texas medicine·2021
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare policy
    • Medical quality assurance

    Background:

    • Medicare peer review has a long history.
    • Texas has faced unique challenges with its peer review organization.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To trace the evolution of Medicare peer review.
    • To examine Texas-specific issues and solutions in physician peer review.
    • To illustrate the impact of physician engagement in organized medicine.

    Main Methods:

    • Historical tracing of Medicare peer review.
    • Case study of Texas's peer review organization.
    • Personal involvement narrative of the author.
    • Analysis of solutions by the Texas Medical Association Physician-Patient Advocacy Committee.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Identified specific problems within Texas's peer review system.
    • Documented successful solutions implemented by the Texas Medical Association Physician-Patient Advocacy Committee.
    • Demonstrated the potential for individual physicians to influence the peer review process through organized medicine.

    Conclusions:

    • Physician involvement in organized medicine is crucial for effective peer review.
    • Lessons learned from Texas offer insights for future improvements in Medicare peer review.
    • Proactive engagement can address state-specific healthcare quality challenges.