Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

What the AI era doctor should know: a scoping review of proposed artificial intelligence competencies for medical education.

NPJ digital medicine·2026

Same author

Evidence-Based Trainee Selection-Reply.

JAMA internal medicine·2026

Same author

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Four Habits Coding Scheme into Danish: a study of inter- and intra-rater reliability in face-to-face and video consultations.

BMC medical education·2026

Same author

Perceived Strengths and Gaps of Critical Care Fellows Across Emergency Medicine and Other Specialties.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2026

Same author

Current practices and challenges associated with student remediation: results of a national survey of clerkship directors.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026

Same author

Patient-reported dyspnoea predicts six-fold increased hospital mortality.

ERJ open research·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Assessing the Effectiveness of Case-Based Collaborative Learning via Randomized Controlled Trial.

Edward Krupat¹, Jeremy B Richards, Amy M Sullivan

¹E. Krupat is director, Center for Evaluation, Harvard Medical School, and associate professor of psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. J.B. Richards is assistant professor, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. At the time of the study, J.B.R. was assistant professor of medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. A.M. Sullivan is director for research, The Academy at Harvard Medical School, and assistant professor, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and director for education research, Shapiro Institute for Education and Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. T.J. Fleenor Jr is project coordinator, Center for Evaluation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. R.M. Schwartzstein is Ellen and Melvin Gordon Professor of Medicine and Medical Education and faculty associate dean for medical education, Harvard Medical School, vice president for education, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and executive director, Carl J. Shapiro Institute for Education and Research, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

|November 26, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) is an effective active learning method that engages students. This approach may particularly benefit students with lower academic performance, showing higher exam scores compared to traditional methods.

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Active Learning Strategies
Collaborative Learning

Background:

Traditional medical education often relies on passive learning methods.
There is a need for innovative teaching strategies to enhance student engagement and outcomes.
Case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) integrates principles from team-based, problem-based, and case-based learning.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce the novel Case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) pedagogical approach.
To assess the effectiveness of CBCL in a first-year medical physiology course at Harvard Medical School.
To compare CBCL with traditional Problem-based learning (PBL) in terms of student performance and engagement.

Main Methods:

A randomized controlled trial involving 64 medical and dental student volunteers.
Students were assigned to either PBL (control) or CBCL (experimental) tutorial groups.
Outcomes measured included final exam scores, post-course surveys, and behavioral coding of class sessions.

Main Results:

No significant difference in overall final exam scores between CBCL and PBL groups.
CBCL students with lower prior academic performance scored significantly higher on the physiology exam than their PBL counterparts.
CBCL was described by students as "engaging," "fun," and "thought-provoking," with higher observed individual affect.

Conclusions:

Case-based collaborative learning (CBCL) is a viable and engaging active learning method.
CBCL demonstrates potential to particularly benefit students with lower academic performance.
The approach fosters a positive and stimulating learning environment.