Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Aesthetic refinements in reconstructive microsurgery.

B A Toth1, L F Elliott

  • 1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.

Annals of Plastic Surgery
|February 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast augmentation with round, smooth saline or gel implants: the pros and cons.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Retrospective study of the skin-sparing mastectomy in breast reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
Same author

Use of a superficial temporal fascia flap for coverage of an exposed cochlear implant.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·1999
Same author

Advancement of the midface using distraction techniques.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
Same author

The Rubens flap. The deep circumflex iliac artery flap.

Clinics in plastic surgery·1998
Same author

Distraction osteogenesis and its application to the midface and bony orbit in craniosynostosis syndromes.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·1998
Same journal

The Rise of Nerve Transfers: Tracing a National Evolution Toward the Postgrafting Era in Brachial Plexus Injury Management.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Response to: The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Review of Pressure Sores: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Surgical Management.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Venous Flow-Through Flaps in Hand Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Experimental Rat Peripheral Nerve Models: Surgical Exposures and Applications.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

The Cost of Matching into Plastic Surgery.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Reconstructive surgeons can now achieve aesthetic results with minimal donor site morbidity using advanced free tissue transfer techniques. This approach focuses on both defect restoration and aesthetic outcomes for the donor site.

Area of Science:

  • Microsurgery
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Vascular Biology

Background:

  • Free tissue transfer has advanced significantly, offering numerous options for reconstructive surgeons.
  • Improved understanding of vascular systems enhances surgical precision and outcomes.
  • Reconstructive surgery aims to restore form and function while minimizing donor site impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the establishment of reconstructive goals focused on aesthetic and functional restoration.
  • To highlight the achievement of refined aesthetic results for both the defect and donor sites.
  • To demonstrate the successful application of these principles in various clinical scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current free tissue transfer techniques and vascular knowledge.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of goal-setting strategies in reconstructive surgery.
  • Case examples illustrating aesthetic and functional outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Free tissue transfer enables defect reconstruction with aesthetic considerations.
    • Minimal donor site morbidity is achievable through careful planning and execution.
    • Refined aesthetic results are attainable for both the recipient and donor sites.

    Conclusions:

    • Modern reconstructive surgery leverages free tissue options for superior aesthetic and functional outcomes.
    • Setting clear reconstructive goals is crucial for achieving patient satisfaction.
    • Advanced techniques minimize donor site morbidity, improving the overall patient experience.