Test-retest reliability of effective connectivity in the face perception network
Stefan Frässle1,2, Frieder Michel Paulus3, Sören Krach3
1Laboratory for Multimodal Neuroimaging (LMN), Department of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Marburg, 35039, Germany.
Human Brain Mapping
|November 28, 2015
Summary
This study demonstrates that a specific fMRI paradigm reliably measures brain region connectivity using Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM). The findings support its use for investigating neural mechanisms in healthy individuals and psychiatric disorders.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) is a powerful tool for inferring effective connectivity in the brain.
- Understanding the reliability of DCM is crucial for its application in neuroscience research and clinical settings.
- Systematic analyses of within-subject stability for fMRI-based DCM are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the test-retest reliability of an fMRI paradigm for DCM analysis.
- To assess the reliability of both BOLD activity and effective connectivity measures within the face perception network.
- To determine the impact of experiment length on the reliability of DCM results.
Main Methods:
- Examined test-retest reliability of face-specific BOLD activity in 25 healthy volunteers across two sessions.
- Assessed the stability of effective connectivity using Bayesian model selection and parameter estimation in DCM.
- Investigated the influence of experiment duration on BOLD activity and DCM reliability.
Main Results:
- Good to excellent reliability was found for BOLD activity in DCM-relevant regions.
- Excellent reliability was observed for negative free energy, and good reliability for parameter estimation in DCM.
- Reliability of BOLD activity and DCM results showed only a slight decrease with shortened experiment duration.
Conclusions:
- The presented fMRI paradigm offers reliable estimates for activation and effective connectivity measures.
- The paradigm is suitable for studying neural mechanisms in both normal cognitive function and psychiatric disorders.
- The findings support the use of this paradigm for clinical applications in psychiatric research.


