Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Modeling Primary Bone Tumors and Bone Metastasis with Solid Tumor Graft Implantation into Bone
Published on: September 9, 2020
Complete twelve month bone remodeling with a bi-phasic injectable bone substitute in benign bone tumors: a
Jacek Kaczmarczyk1, Piotr Sowinski2, Maciej Goch3
1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. dr.kaczmarczyk@gmail.com.
Background:
Benign primary bone tumors are commonly treated by surgery involving bone grafts or synthetic bone void fillers. Although synthetic bone grafts may provide early mechanical support while minimizing the risk of donor-site morbidity and disease transmission, difficult handling properties and less than optimal transformation to bone have limited their use.
Methods:
In a prospective series, patients with benign bone tumors were treated by minimal invasive intervention with a bi-phasic and injectable ceramic bone substitute (CERAMENT™ BONE VOID FILLER, BoneSupport, Sweden) with the hypothesis that open surgery with bone grafting might be avoided. The defects were treated by either mini-invasive surgery (solid tumors) or percutaneous injection (cysts) and followed clinically and radiologically for 12 months. CT scan was performed after 12 months to confirm bone remodeling of the bone substitute. All patients were allowed full weight bearing immediately after surgery.
Results:
Fourteen patients with a median age of 13 years (range 7-75) were consecutively recruited during 11 months. Eleven lesions were bone cysts (eight unicameral and three post-traumatic) and three were solid benign tumors. The median size of the lesions was 40 mL (range 1-152). The most common location was humerus (n = 10). After 12 months the defects completely or partially filled with median 18 mL (range 5-28) of bone substitute demonstrated full resolution (Neer Classification grade I) in 11 patients, partial resolution (Neer II) in 2 patients and in 1 patient the cyst persisted (Neer III). No lesions required recurrent surgery during the observation period. No post-operative fracture or infection was recorded.
Conclusions:
Minimal invasive treatment with a bi-phasic and injectable ceramic bone substitute might offer an alternative to regular bone grafting due to convenient handling properties and rapid bone remodeling.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials NCT02567084 Release Date 10/01/2015.
More Related Videos
04:32Half-segmental Diaphyseal Bone Defect Model in Rats for Evaluating Bone Substitute Performance in Load-bearing Regions
Published on: December 30, 2025
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bone Remodeling
Bone Remodeling and Repair