Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Exploring the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the evaluation of surrogate
Wim Van der Elst1, Geert Molenberghs1,2, Ariel Alonso2
1I-BioStat, Universiteit Hasselt, B-3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Abstract:
Nowadays, two main frameworks for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints, based on causal-inference and meta-analysis, dominate the scene. Earlier work showed that the metrics of surrogacy introduced in both paradigms are related, although in a complex way that is difficult to study analytically. In the present work, this relationship is further examined using simulations and the analysis of a case study. The results indicate that the extent to which both paradigms lead to similar conclusions regarding the validity of the surrogate, depends on a complex interplay between multiple factors like the ratio of the between and within trial variability and the unidentifiable correlations between the potential outcomes. All the analyses were carried out using the newly developed R package Surrogate, which is freely available via CRAN.
Related Concept Videos
Causality in Epidemiology
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction to Epidemiology
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
