Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Construction and Systematical Symmetric Studies of a Series of Supramolecular Clusters with Binary or Ternary Ammonium Triphenylacetates
Published on: February 15, 2016
On the Structure and Geometry of Biomolecular Binding Motifs (Hydrogen-Bonding, Stacking, X-H···π): WFT and DFT
Kevin E Riley1, Michal Pitoňák1, Jiří Černý1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 23346, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico 00931, Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and Center of Biomolecules and Complex Molecular Systems, Flemingovo nam. 2, 166 10 Prague 6, Czech Republic, Department of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynska Dolina CH-1, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, Institute of Biotechnology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 142 00 Prague 4, Czech Republic, and Department of Physical Chemistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Abstract:
The strengths of noncovalent interactions are generally very sensitive to a number of geometric parameters. Among the most important of these parameters is the separation between the interacting moieties (in the case of an intermolecular interaction, this would be the intermolecular separation). Most works seeking to characterize the properties of intermolecular interactions are mainly concerned with binding energies obtained at the potential energy minimum (as determined at some particular level of theory). In this work, in order to extend our understanding of these types of noncovalent interactions, we investigate the distance dependence of several types of intermolecular interactions, these are hydrogen bonds, stacking interactions, dispersion interactions, and X-H···π interactions. There are several methods that have traditionally been used to treat noncovalent interactions as well as many new methods that have emerged within the past three or four years. Here we obtain reference data using estimated CCSD(T) values at the complete basis set limit (using the CBS(T) method); potential energy curves are also produced using several other methods thought to be accurate for intermolecular interactions, these are MP2/cc-pVTZ, MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ, MP2/6-31G*(0.25), SCS(MI)-MP2/cc-pVTZ, estimated MP2.5/CBS, DFT-SAPT/aug-cc-pVTZ, DFT/M06-2X/6-311+G(2df,2p), and DFT-D/TPSS/6-311++G(3df,3pd). The basis set superposition error is systematically considered throughout the study. It is found that the MP2.5 and DFT-SAPT methods, which are both quite computationally intensive, produce potential energy curves that are in very good agreement to those of the reference method. Among the MP2 techniques, which can be said to be of medium computational expense, the best results are obtained with MP2/cc-pVTZ and SCS(MI)-MP2/cc-pVTZ. DFT-D/TPSS/6-311++G(3df,3pd) is the DFT-based method that can be said to give the most well-balanced description of intermolecular interactions.
Related Concept Videos
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Hydrogen Bonds
Hydrogen Bonds
Hydrogen Bonds Control the World!
Because hydrogen has very weak electronegativity when it binds with a strongly electronegative atom, such as oxygen or nitrogen, electrons in the bond are unequally shared....
VSEPR Theory

