Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Computing the Effects of a Local Radiofrequency Hyperthermia Intervention on Tumor Biomechanics
Published on: December 1, 2023
Mathematical models for explaining the Warburg effect: a review focussed on ATP and biomass production
Stefan Schuster1, Daniel Boley2, Philip Möller3
1Department of Bioinformatics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Ernst-Abbe-Platz 2, 07743 Jena, Germany stefan.schu@uni-jena.de.
Abstract:
For producing ATP, tumour cells rely on glycolysis leading to lactate to about the same extent as on respiration. Thus, the ATP synthesis flux from glycolysis is considerably higher than in the corresponding healthy cells. This is known as the Warburg effect (named after German biochemist Otto H. Warburg) and also applies to striated muscle cells, activated lymphocytes, microglia, endothelial cells and several other cell types. For similar phenomena in several yeasts and many bacteria, the terms Crabtree effect and overflow metabolism respectively, are used. The Warburg effect is paradoxical at first sight because the molar ATP yield of glycolysis is much lower than that of respiration. Although a straightforward explanation is that glycolysis allows a higher ATP production rate, the question arises why cells do not re-allocate protein to the high-yield pathway of respiration. Mathematical modelling can help explain this phenomenon. Here, we review several models at various scales proposed in the literature for explaining the Warburg effect. These models support the hypothesis that glycolysis allows for a higher proliferation rate due to increased ATP production and precursor supply rates.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Logarithmic Concentration–Effect Model
The de Broglie Wavelength
Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

