Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

744
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
744
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

4.2K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
4.2K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

67.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.2K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

275.1K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
275.1K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

71.7K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
71.7K
Structuralism01:26

Structuralism

4.0K
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid phenotypic differentiation in the iconic Japanese knotweed s.l. invading novel habitats.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Phenotypic plasticity is the major determinant of changes in phenotypic integration in Arabidopsis.

The New phytologist·2021
Same author

Is there a will to meaning?

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2018
Same author

The power of meaning: the quest for an existential roadmap.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2018
Same author

Manipulative Approaches to Testing Adaptive Plasticity: Phytochrome-Mediated Shade-Avoidance Responses in Plants.

The American naturalist·2018
Same author

MUTATIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENETIC VARIANCE-COVARIANCE MATRICES: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH USING INDUCED MUTATIONS IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same journal

Reconciling Subsistence Emissions and Prevention in Environmentally Sustainable Healthcare.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
Same journal

Why the Social Gradient in Health-Related Behaviour is Unjust : An Unconditionalist Perspective.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
Same journal

Mapping the Representation of Race and Other Health Disparities in U.S. Orthopaedic Journals : A Scoping Review.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
Same journal

Safeguarding Physical and Mental Health Rights in African Conflict Regions: Ethical Responsibilities, Barriers, and Collaborative Efforts.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
Same journal

Ibsen's An Enemy of the People and the Ethics of Public Health Disclosure.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
Same journal

Is Unconsciousness the Intention? Physicians' Perspectives on Palliative Sedation Outside Specialized Palliative Care: A Qualitative Study.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.4K

Scientism and Pseudoscience: A Philosophical Commentary.

Massimo Pigliucci1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, The City College of New York, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, 10031, USA. massimo@platofootnote.org.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
|November 30, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies the term "scientism," distinguishing appropriate critiques from dismissive uses. It uses homeopathy and bioethics controversies to analyze scientism debates within the "two cultures" framework.

Keywords:
HomeopathyPseudoscienceScientismTwo cultures

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.9K
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
26:41

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

5.4K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.9K
Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Bioethics
  • History of Science

Background:

  • The term "scientism" carries varied connotations, often used to dismiss opposing viewpoints without substantive argument.
  • Understanding the appropriate use of "scientism" is crucial for productive scientific discourse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between dismissive and legitimate uses of the term "scientism."
  • To analyze the concept of scientism using an analogy with "pseudoscience."
  • To contextualize the debate within C.P. Snow's "two cultures" framework.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the term "scientism."
  • Analogy drawn between "scientism" and "pseudoscience."
  • Case study of a bioethics controversy regarding homeopathy.

Main Results:

  • Identified inappropriate uses of "scientism" as mere dismissals.
  • Established legitimate negative uses of "scientism" through analogy.
  • Demonstrated the application of these concepts in the homeopathy debate.

Conclusions:

  • The critique of "scientism" requires careful definition to avoid ad hominem attacks.
  • The homeopathy controversy exemplifies the challenges in defining and applying "scientism."
  • Framing scientism debates within the "two cultures" context offers valuable insights into science and humanities interactions.