π Interactions Studied with Electronic Structure Methods: The Ethyne Methyl Isocyanide Complex and Thioanisole
Natalie H Bretherick1, Tanja van Mourik1
1School of Chemistry, University of St. Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9ST, Scotland, United Kingdom.
This study compares electronic structure methods for molecular systems, finding that dispersion corrections improve accuracy. Methods like M05-2X and B3LYP-D accurately predict π hydrogen bonds and conformational energies, outperforming standard B3LYP and MP2.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- Previous studies reported discrepancies between B3LYP and MP2 methods for certain molecular systems.
- Accurate computational methods are crucial for understanding non-covalent interactions and molecular conformations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance of various electronic structure methods, including density functionals and DFT-D, for molecular systems with π hydrogen bonds and conformational flexibility.
- To assess the accuracy of these methods by comparing them to high-level coupled cluster with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples (CCSD(T))/complete basis set (CBS) calculations.
Main Methods:
- Employed a range of electronic structure methods: meta and double hybrid density functionals, DFT-D, and coupled cluster theory.
- Calculated interaction energies for the ethyne methyl isocyanide complex and potential energy curves for thioanisole conformations.
- Assessed method performance against estimated CCSD(T)/CBS reference values.
Main Results:
- For the ethyne methyl isocyanide complex, B3LYP underestimated interaction energy, likely due to missing dispersion. B3LYP-D, M05-2X, and mPW2-PLYP-D showed good agreement with CCSD(T) estimates.
- Thioanisole's conformational analysis revealed strong dependence on method and basis set. MP2, B3LYP, M05-2X, mPW2-PLYP, and mPW2-PLYP-D provided reasonable agreement with CCSD(T)/CBS, while B3LYP-D and M06-L overestimated rotational barriers.
Conclusions:
- Dispersion corrections are essential for accurately describing π hydrogen bonds and conformational preferences in the studied systems.
- Methods incorporating dispersion, such as B3LYP-D and M05-2X, offer improved accuracy compared to standard B3LYP and MP2 for these systems.
- The choice of electronic structure method and basis set significantly impacts the reliability of calculated molecular properties.
Related Concept Videos
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
π Molecular Orbitals of the Allyl Cation and Anion


