Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
A randomized controlled trial of co-payment elimination: the CHORD trial
Kevin G Volpp1, Andrea B Troxel, Judith A Long
1Center for Health Equity Research & Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, PA
Insights
Reducing co-payments for blood pressure medications did not improve medication adherence or blood pressure control in patients with poorly controlled hypertension. Financial incentives did not lead to better health outcomes in this study.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Value-based insurance design aims to improve adherence and outcomes by reducing patient cost-sharing.
- Evidence on the effectiveness of reduced co-payments for chronic disease medications is limited.
- Hypertension management requires consistent medication adherence for effective blood pressure control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if eliminating patient co-payments for blood pressure medications improves blood pressure control.
- To assess the impact of financial incentives on medication adherence in hypertensive patients.
- To determine the efficacy of reduced cost-sharing in improving health outcomes for poorly controlled hypertension.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial (Collaboration to Reduce Disparities in Hypertension - CHORD) was conducted.
- 479 patients with poorly controlled systolic blood pressure were enrolled.
- Interventions included co-payment reduction, computerized behavioral intervention, or usual care over 12 months.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in medication adherence (medication possession ratio) was observed between groups.
- Blood pressure decreased similarly in both the financial incentive and usual care groups.
- The proportion of patients achieving blood pressure control did not differ significantly between the incentive and control groups.
Conclusions:
- Reducing patient co-payments for blood pressure medications, as implemented, did not improve medication adherence.
- Financial incentives did not lead to improved blood pressure control in patients with poorly controlled hypertension.
- The study suggests that cost-sharing reductions alone may not be sufficient to enhance adherence or outcomes in this population.
Objectives:
Efforts to improve adherence by reducing co-payments through value-based insurance design are become more prevalent despite limited evidence of improved health outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether eliminating patient co-payments for blood pressure medications improves blood pressure control.
Study Design:
Randomized controlled trial.
Methods:
The Collaboration to Reduce Disparities in Hypertension (CHORD) was a randomized controlled trial with 12 months' follow-up conducted among patients from the Philadelphia and Pittsburgh Veterans Administration Medical Centers. We enrolled 479 patients with poorly controlled systolic blood pressure. Participants were randomly assigned to: a) receive reductions in co-payments from $8 to $0 per medication per month for each antihypertensive prescription filled, b) a computerized behavioral intervention (CBI), c) both co-pay reduction and CBI, or d) usual care. Our main outcome measure was change in systolic blood pressure from enrollment to 12 months post enrollment. We also measured adherence using the medication possession ratio in a subset of participants.
Results:
There were no significant interactions between the co-payment interventions and the CBI interventions. There was no relative difference in the change in medication possession ratio between baseline and 12 months (0.05% and -.90% in control and incentive groups, respectively; P = .74) or in continuous medication gaps of 30, 60, or 90 days. Blood pressure decreased among all participants, but to a similar degree between the financial incentive and control groups. Systolic pressure within the incentive group dropped 13.2 mm Hg versus 15.2 mm Hg for the control group (difference = 2.0; 95% CI, -2.3 to 6.3; P = .36). The proportion of patients with blood pressure under control at 12 months was 29.5% in the incentive group versus 33.9 in the control group (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.3; P = .36).
Conclusions:
Among patients with poorly controlled blood pressure, financial incentives--as implemented in this trial--that reduced patient cost sharing for blood pressure medications did not improve medication adherence or blood pressure control.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Clinical Trials: Overview
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Preventive Healthcare Services

