Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Investigating the Effects of Probiotics on Pneumococcal Colonization Using an In Vitro Adherence Assay
Published on: April 28, 2014
Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in very preterm infants: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial
Kate Costeloe1, Pollyanna Hardy2, Edmund Juszczak2
1Centre for Paediatrics, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Insights
This study found that the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 did not significantly reduce necrotising enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, or death in preterm infants. Therefore, routine use of this probiotic is not supported for prevention in very preterm infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal research
- Microbiome and infant health
- Clinical trial methodology
Background:
- Probiotics are investigated for their potential to reduce necrotising enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis in preterm infants.
- Concerns exist regarding the rigor and generalizability of previous probiotic trials in neonates.
- There is no established consensus on the routine use of probiotics for preterm infants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in reducing necrotising enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, and mortality in preterm infants.
- To provide robust evidence to inform clinical practice regarding probiotic supplementation in neonatal intensive care.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial (PiPS trial) involving infants born between 23 and 30 weeks' gestational age.
- Randomised assignment (1:1) to receive either Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 or a placebo (dilute infant formula).
- Primary outcomes included necrotising enterocolitis (Bell stage 2 or 3), sepsis (blood culture positive >72h), and death before hospital discharge. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed in the rates of necrotising enterocolitis, sepsis, or death between the probiotic and placebo groups.
- Necrotising enterocolitis occurred in 9% of the probiotic group vs. 10% of the placebo group (aRR 0.93).
- Sepsis occurred in 11% of the probiotic group vs. 12% of the placebo group (aRR 0.97), and death occurred in 8% vs. 9% respectively (aRR 0.93). No adverse events were reported.
Conclusions:
- The study found no evidence of benefit for Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in preventing necrotising enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis in very preterm infants.
- The results do not support the routine administration of B. breve BBG-001 for this vulnerable population.
- Further research may be needed to explore specific probiotic strains or different infant populations.
Background:
Probiotics may reduce necrotising enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis after preterm birth. However, there has been concern about the rigour and generalisability of some trials and there is no agreement about whether or not they should be used routinely. We aimed to test the effectiveness of the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 to reduce necrotising enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, and death in preterm infants.
Methods:
In this multicentre, randomised controlled phase 3 study (the PiPS trial), we recruited infants born between 23 and 30 weeks' gestational age within 48 h of birth from 24 hospitals in southeast England. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to probiotic or placebo via a minimisation algorithm randomisation programme. The probiotic intervention was B breve BBG-001 suspended in dilute elemental infant formula given enterally in a daily dose of 8·2 to 9·2 log10 CFU; the placebo was dilute infant formula alone. Clinicians and families were masked to allocation. The primary outcomes were necrotising enterocolitis (Bell stage 2 or 3), blood culture positive sepsis more than 72 h after birth; and death before discharge from hospital. All primary analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 05511098 and EudraCT, number 2006-003445-17.
Findings:
Between July 1, 2010, and July 31, 2013, 1315 infants were recruited; of whom 654 were allocated to probiotic and 661 to placebo. Five infants had consent withdrawn after randomisation, thus 650 were analysed in the probiotic group and 660 in the placebo group. Rates of the primary outcomes did not differ significantly between the probiotic and placebo groups. 61 infants (9%) in the probiotic group had necrotising enterocolitis compared with 66 (10%) in the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio 0·93 (95% CI 0·68-1·27); 73 (11%) infants in the probiotics group had sepsis compared with 77 (12%) in the placebo group (0·97 (0·73-1·29); and 54 (8%) deaths occurred before discharge home in the probiotic group compared with 56 (9%) in the placebo group (0·93 [0·67-1·30]). No probiotic-associated adverse events were reported.
Interpretation:
There is no evidence of benefit for this intervention in this population; this result does not support the routine use of B breve BBG-001 for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis and late-onset sepis in very preterm infants.
Funding:
UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Development of Human Microbiota
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Microbiota of the Respiratory Tract

