Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Optimal boundary detection method and window settings for coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume analysis in coronary
Ran Heo1,2, Hyung-Bok Park1,3, Byoung Kwon Lee4
1Yonsei-Cedars Sinai Integrative Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea.
Insights
Quantitative plaque volume analysis using coronary CT angiography (QCT) is a new method. The optimal approach uses a fixed 0.3-mm gap and fixed Hounsfield unit (HU) settings for accurate results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular imaging
- Medical diagnostics
- Radiology
Background:
- Quantitative plaque volume analysis by coronary CT angiography (QCT) is an emerging technique.
- Accurate plaque volume measurement is crucial for assessing cardiovascular disease.
- Standardization of QCT methodology is needed for reliable plaque quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal methodology for quantitative plaque volume analysis using coronary CT angiography (QCT).
- To compare different boundary detection methods and window width/level settings for QCT plaque volume assessment.
- To validate QCT findings against intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-one coronary artery segments were analyzed using QCT.
- Two boundary detection methods were compared: no gap and a fixed 0.3-mm gap.
- Three window width and level (WW/WL) settings were evaluated: fixed (740/220 HU), segment-adjusted, and aorta-adjusted.
Main Results:
- The fixed 0.3-mm gap method showed no significant difference compared to IVUS for plaque volume (139.8 ± 93.9 mm³ vs. 136.1 ± 72.8 mm³).
- The 'no gap' method significantly underestimated plaque volume compared to IVUS (105.4 ± 82.3 mm³ vs. 136.1 ± 72.8 mm³).
- The fixed HU setting (740/220) demonstrated the least mean difference in plaque volume compared to IVUS (3.8 ± 39.8 mm³).
Conclusions:
- Optimal quantitative plaque volume assessment using QCT is achieved with a fixed 0.3-mm gap for boundary detection.
- The fixed Hounsfield unit (HU) setting of 740/220 provides the most accurate plaque volume measurements.
- This standardized QCT approach enhances the reliability of plaque quantification in coronary artery disease.
Objective:
To evaluate optimal methodology for quantitative plaque volume analysis by coronary CT angiography (QCT).
Methods:
Fifty-one coronary artery segments were evaluated and contour measurements based on two different methods [(1) no gap, or (2) fixed 0.3-mm gap between inner and outer boundary] were compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In addition, three different window width (WW) and level (WL) settings [fixed (740/220) Hounsfield unit (HU), adjusted (155 % and 65 % of mean luminal intensity of the segment, and aorta adjusted (155 % and 65 % of mean luminal intensity of central aorta)] were used for semiautomated plaque volume analysis.
Results:
For boundary detection, the no gap method led to underestimation compared with IVUS (105.4 ± 82.3 vs. 136.1 ± 72.8 mm(3), p < 0.001), while fixed 0.3-mm gap showed no difference between IVUS and QCT (136.1 ± 72.8 vs. 139.8 ± 93.9 mm(3), p = 0.50). Comparison of the three different window settings demonstrated that the aorta adjusted setting underestimated (120.5 ± 74.3 vs. 136.1 ± 72.8 mm(3), p = 0.003), while fixed setting showed the least mean difference compared with IVUS (3.8 ± 39.8 mm(3), p = 0.50).
Conclusion:
For plaque volumetric assessment, optimal results were obtained with fixed 0.3-mm gap with fixed HU setting (740/220).
Key Points:
• Quantitative plaque volume analysis by coronary CT angiography has recently emerged. • Different boundary detection methods and window width and level settings were evaluated. • Fixed 0.3-mm gap with fixed HU setting (740/220) afforded optimal results.
More Related Videos
06:57Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Imaging - Introducing the Spatially Weighted Calcium Score for Early Disease Detection
Published on: September 22, 2023
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT