Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Mitigating the Effects of Nonadherence in Clinical Trials
Thomas M Shiovitz1,2, Earle E Bain3, David J McCann4
1California Neuroscience Research Medical Group, Sherman Oaks, CA, USA.
Abstract:
Accounting for subject nonadherence and eliminating inappropriate subjects in clinical trials are critical elements of a successful study. Nonadherence can increase variance, lower study power, and reduce the magnitude of treatment effects. Inappropriate subjects (including those who do not have the illness under study, fail to report exclusionary conditions, falsely report medication adherence, or participate in concurrent trials) confound safety and efficacy signals. This paper, a product of the International Society for CNS Clinical Trial Methodology (ISCTM) Working Group on Nonadherence in Clinical Trials, explores and models nonadherence in clinical trials and puts forth specific recommendations to identify and mitigate its negative effects. These include statistical analyses of nonadherence data, novel protocol design, and the use of biomarkers, subject registries, and/or medication adherence technologies.
Insights
Addressing subject nonadherence and inappropriate participants is crucial for clinical trial success. This study recommends statistical analyses, protocol designs, and technologies to mitigate these issues, ensuring reliable trial data.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial methodology
- Pharmacovigilance
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Subject nonadherence and inappropriate enrollment negatively impact clinical trial validity.
- Nonadherence inflates variance, reduces statistical power, and diminishes observed treatment effects.
- Inappropriate subjects introduce confounding factors affecting safety and efficacy assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore and model nonadherence in clinical trials.
- To provide recommendations for identifying and mitigating nonadherence and inappropriate subject enrollment.
- To enhance the reliability and integrity of clinical trial data.
Main Methods:
- Exploration and modeling of nonadherence patterns.
- Review of existing challenges in subject adherence and eligibility.
- Development of recommendations for protocol design and data analysis.
Main Results:
- Nonadherence and inappropriate subjects significantly compromise trial outcomes.
- Statistical analyses, novel protocols, and adherence technologies are effective mitigation strategies.
- Biomarkers and subject registries can aid in identifying and managing nonadherence.
Conclusions:
- Proactive management of subject nonadherence and eligibility is essential for robust clinical trial results.
- Implementing recommended strategies can improve data quality and trial efficiency.
- The International Society for CNS Clinical Trial Methodology (ISCTM) provides a framework for addressing these critical issues.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Blinding
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications

