Related Experiment Videos
Relaxation training side effects reported by seriously disturbed inpatients.
H C Rickard1, A D McCoy, J B Collier
1University of Alabama.
Journal of Clinical Psychology
|May 1, 1989
Summary
Seriously disturbed inpatients experienced few side effects from passive and progressive relaxation training. No significant difference in adverse events was found between the two relaxation techniques.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Behavioral Medicine
Background:
- Relaxation training is a common therapeutic intervention.
- Understanding potential side effects is crucial for patient safety.
- Seriously disturbed inpatients may have unique responses to psychological interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the frequency and nature of side effects from passive and progressive relaxation training.
- To compare side effects between passive and progressive relaxation techniques.
- To compare patient-reported side effects with therapist-reported practices.
Main Methods:
- A study involving seriously disturbed inpatients undergoing passive and progressive relaxation training.
- Systematic collection of reported side effects.
- Comparison of side effect data between the two training methods.
- Comparison with survey data from therapists.
Main Results:
- The majority of inpatients reported minimal to no side effects.
- Only one out of 64 subjects discontinued training due to a negative reaction.
- No statistically significant difference in side effect incidence was observed between passive and progressive relaxation training.
Conclusions:
- Passive and progressive relaxation training appear to be safe interventions for seriously disturbed inpatients.
- The risk of significant adverse events is low for both techniques.
- Findings support the use of relaxation training in this patient population.