Related Experiment Videos
Drugs down the drain: When nurses object.
1Longmont United Hospital, USA.
Nursing Ethics
|December 9, 2015
Summary
Nurses flushing controlled substances down drains may face moral distress due to environmental concerns. Inconsistent regulations and institutional policies necessitate further study to support nurses with alternatives.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Nursing Ethics
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Nursing practice includes disposing of unaltered controlled substances into public water systems.
- This practice raises concerns about potential environmental harm.
- Inconsistent interpretations of controlled substance management regulations lead to varied institutional disposal policies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the ethical and environmental implications of nursing practices in disposing of controlled substances.
- To explore the phenomenon of conscientious objection among nurses regarding drug disposal.
- To advocate for further research and support for nurses facing moral conflicts with current disposal methods.
Main Methods:
- Benchmarking survey of regional hospitals to understand current disposal policies.
- Review of the history of controlled substance management and regulations.
- Analysis of the 'double effect' logic applied to drug disposal practices.
Main Results:
- Significant variation exists in institutional policies for controlled substance disposal.
- Nurses may experience moral distress when compelled to dispose of narcotics via drains.
- The 'double effect' justification for flushing drugs lacks substantial supporting evidence.
Conclusions:
- The practice of flushing controlled substances warrants further investigation.
- Nurse managers and administrators should develop and offer alternatives to nurses objecting to drain disposal.
- Addressing nurses' moral integrity in relation to environmental concerns is crucial for ethical nursing practice.