Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Input-dependent directionality of interactions between cortical areas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Interactions across hemispheres in prefrontal cortex reflect global cognitive processing.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Functional reorganization of motor cortex connectivity during learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

A posture subspace in the primary motor cortex.

Neuron·2025

Same author

Brain-computer interfaces as a causal probe for scientific inquiry.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025

Same author

Fast Multigroup Gaussian Process Factor Models.

Neural computation·2025

Same journal

Non-canonical amino acid incorporation enables minimally disruptive labeling of stress granule and TDP-43 proteinopathy.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Analysis of dendritic input currents during place field dynamics.

eLife·2026

Same journal

TopoMetry systematically learns and evaluates the latent geometry of single-cell data.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Navigating the path: Advice to physician-scientists on choosing a clinical specialty.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Neural activity profiles reveal overlapping, intermingled subpopulations spanning area borders in mouse sensorimotor cortex.

eLife·2026

Same journal

The exquisite mechanics of a tsetse bite.

eLife·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

Internal models for interpreting neural population activity during sensorimotor control.

Matthew D Golub^1,2, Byron M Yu^1,2,3, Steven M Chase^2,3

¹Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States.

|December 10, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Brain internal models explain most movement errors during brain-machine interface (BMI) use. Mismatches between internal models and BMI performance account for 65% of errors and slow speed control, guiding BMI learning.

Keywords:

brain-machine interfaces internal models motor control neuroscience rhesus macaque

More Related Videos

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants

Published on: October 4, 2015

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Motor Control

Background:

The brain generates voluntary movements by integrating sensory feedback, internal state tracking, and motor commands.
Internal models are hypothesized to represent prior beliefs about how the body, specifically limbs, respond to motor commands.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate moment-by-moment internal model computations during brain-machine interface (BMI) use.
To quantify the contribution of internal model discrepancies to movement errors and speed control deficits in BMI paradigms.
To analyze neural population activity changes associated with internal model updates during BMI learning.

Main Methods:

Utilized a brain-machine interface (BMI) paradigm with rhesus monkeys.
Applied novel statistical analyses to neural population activity recordings.
Quantified movement errors and speed control in relation to internal model predictions.

Main Results:

A mismatch between the subjects' internal models and the actual BMI system explained approximately 65% of observed movement errors.
Discrepancies in internal models were found to underlie persistent deficits in BMI speed control.
Neural population activity was characterized in relation to internal model dynamics during BMI learning.

Conclusions:

Internal models play a critical role in real-time motor control, with mismatches significantly impacting BMI performance.
Understanding internal model computations offers a pathway to improve BMI control and address learning deficits.
This research provides a framework for interpreting neural activity based on how prior beliefs shape sensory-to-motor transformations.