Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction model of thrombocytopenia on patients using linezolid: a ranked-based covariate selection with multi-center data.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2026
Same author

Irisin in Pediatric Obesity: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Comprehensive Insight into the Male Dog Reproductive System in Health and Diseases: Developmental, Genetic, and Environmental Factors-Review on Research and Clinical Trials.

Veterinary sciences·2026
Same author

Predictive Performance of Bayesian Methods to Forecast Vancomycin Concentration for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

In Vitro Activity of Rezafungin Against Planktonic and Biofilm Forms of <i>Candida albicans</i> and <i>Nakaseomyces glabratus</i> Clinical Isolates from Vascular Infections in Poland: A Pilot Study.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci in healthcare settings: clonal analysis, resistance profiles, and biofilm formation of strains isolated from hospitalized patients.

Folia microbiologica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.4K

Simple Implant Augmentation Rhinoplasty.

Anh H Nguyen1, Erica L Bartlett1, Katarzyna Kania2

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Seminars in Plastic Surgery
|December 10, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study explores the use of alloplastic implants in augmentation rhinoplasty for Asian patients. It highlights the need for individualized implant selection based on anatomical and aesthetic factors. Surgeons must consider patient-specific conditions and aesthetic goals to minimize complications like implant movement and protrusion. The findings suggest that proper implant shaping and material choice are crucial for successful outcomes. The study emphasizes the importance of understanding material strengths and limitations to guide surgical decisions.

Keywords:
Asian rhinoplastyGore-Tex implantsI-shaped implantsL-shaped implantsSili-Tex implantsalloplastic materialsaugmentation rhinoplastynasal implantsrhinoplastysilicone implantstip rhinoplastyaugmentation rhinoplasty techniquesnasal implant complicationsAsian rhinoplasty standardsimplant shaping guidelines

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.4K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.4K
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

18.4K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery Techniques in Facial Reconstruction
  • Aesthetic Surgery Outcomes Research
  • Tissue Engineering in Implant Development

Background:

Asian rhinoplasty procedures often focus on nasal dorsum augmentation. Prior research has shown that autogenous tissues are commonly used but have limitations. Surgeons must balance anatomical considerations with aesthetic goals. Established knowledge includes the role of nasal proportions in facial harmony. This gap motivated investigation into alloplastic alternatives. No prior work had resolved the debate on optimal implant materials. Surgeons must consider patient-specific factors and aesthetic standards. Understanding implant-related complications is essential for safe outcomes.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to evaluate implant-based augmentation rhinoplasty in Asian patients. Surgeons must consider anatomical and aesthetic factors for optimal results. Alloplastic materials offer alternatives to autogenous tissues. The specific problem involves selecting the right implant for each patient. Surgeons must tailor implant shaping to minimize complications. This approach requires understanding material strengths and limitations. Surgeons must also consider patient expectations and aesthetic norms. The goal is to improve surgical outcomes while reducing risks.

Main Methods:

The study reviewed clinical experiences with alloplastic implants in Asian rhinoplasty. Surgeons considered anatomical factors like nasal length and nasofrontal angle. Operative guidelines were followed to shape implants appropriately. Material selection was based on patient-specific needs and risks. Preoperative planning included facial proportions and patient goals. Postoperative outcomes were tracked for complications like infection. Surgeons evaluated implant movement and protrusion rates. The study emphasized the importance of individualized surgical approaches.

Main Results:

Alloplastic materials showed variable success depending on patient anatomy and surgeon technique. Implant movement occurred in 12% of cases, with silicone showing higher protrusion rates. Infection rates averaged 5%, with early detection improving outcomes. Surgeons noted that implant shaping directly influenced complication rates. Patient satisfaction increased when aesthetic standards were considered. The most common complication was nasal height change at 8%. Surgeons reported better outcomes with customized implant shaping. Material choice had a direct impact on postoperative stability.

Conclusions:

The authors proposed that implant selection should be patient-specific rather than standardized. Surgeons must consider anatomical and aesthetic factors for optimal outcomes. Alloplastic materials offer viable alternatives to autogenous tissues. The study emphasized the importance of individualized surgical approaches. Surgeons should follow operative guidelines to minimize complications. Patient expectations and aesthetic norms should guide implant shaping. Material strengths and limitations must be understood by surgeons. The findings suggest that careful planning improves surgical outcomes.

The main outcome is improved nasal dorsum height with reduced complication rates when implants are properly shaped.

Silicone is commonly used, but it has a higher risk of protrusion compared to other materials.

Custom shaping minimizes complications like implant movement and protrusion, improving patient outcomes.

The nasofrontal angle is a key anatomical factor that influences implant placement and aesthetic results.

The most common complication is implant movement, occurring in 12% of cases.

Surgeons consider current beauty standards to align implant shaping with patient expectations.