Prognostic value of left ventricular reverse remodeling and performance improvement after cardiac resynchronization...

The present study was designed to evaluate the respective value of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (changes in LV end-systolic volume relative to baseline (ΔLVESV)) or LV performance improvement (ΔLV ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) or ΔGlobal longitudinal strain (GLS)) to predict long-term outcome in a prospective cohort of consecutive patients receiving routine cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

One hundred and seventy heart failure patients (NYHA classes II-IV, LVEF ≤ 35%, QRS width ≥ 120 ms) underwent echocardiography before and 9 months after CRT. The relationships between ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF, ΔGLS and outcome (all-cause mortality and/or CHF hospitalization, overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality, CHF hospitalization) were investigated.

During a median follow-up of 32 months, 20 patients died and 27 were hospitalized for heart failure. ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF or ΔGLS were significantly associated with all-cause mortality or CHF hospitalization (adjusted hazard's ratio (HR) per standard deviation 0.58 (0.43-0.77), 0.39 (0.27-0.57) or 0.55 (0.37-0.83) respectively, all p < 0.01) and all other endpoints (all p < 0.01). Patients with ΔLVESV≥15%, ΔLVEF ≥ 10% and ΔGLS ≥ 1% had a reduced risk of mortality or CHF hospitalization (adjusted HR=0.25 (0.12-0.51), p < 0.001, adjusted HR = 0.26 (0.13-0.54), p < 0.001 and adjusted HR 0.38 (0.19-0.75), p = 0.006 respectively). Overall performance of multivariate models was better using ΔLVESV or ΔLVEF compared with ΔGLS. Interobserver agreement was excellent for ΔLVESV (Intraclass correlation coefficient - ICC-0.91) and ΔGLS (ICC 0.90) but modest for ΔLVEF (ICC 0.76) in a sample of 20 patients from the study population.

LV reverse remodeling assessed by ΔLVESV is a strong and reproducible predictor of outcome following CRT. Compared with ΔLVESV, ΔLVEF and ΔGLS have important shortcomings: poorer reproducibility or lower predictive value.