Tympanometric Screening Norms for Adults.
American Journal of Audiology
|December 10, 2015
Summary
This study reevaluated tympanometric norms in young adults, finding significant gender differences in acoustic admittance and width. Females exhibited lower peak admittance and volume, but wider tympanograms than males.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Otology
- Acoustic Immittance
Background:
- Established tympanometric normative data, such as Margolis and Heller (1987) and ASHA (1990), are crucial for diagnosing middle ear conditions.
- Previous studies have provided normative values, but reexamination with strict controls is necessary to ensure accuracy and identify potential influencing factors like gender.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reexamine existing normative tympanometric data using stringent age and gender controls.
- To determine normative values for peak, compensated static acoustic admittance (Peak Ytm), acoustic equivalent volume (Vea), and tympanometric width (TW) in a cohort of young adults.
- To compare newly derived normative values with established data and investigate gender-specific differences.
Main Methods:
- Recruited 102 young adults with normal hearing.
- Collected tympanometric data, measuring Peak Ytm, Vea, and TW.
- Analyzed data to establish normative values and compare them against historical data (Margolis and Heller, 1987; ASHA, 1990).
- Performed statistical analyses to identify significant differences, particularly those related to gender.
Main Results:
- Established normative values for Peak Ytm, Vea, and TW in young adults.
- Found statistically significant, though clinically minor, differences in Vea and TW compared to Margolis and Heller (1987) norms.
- Identified clinically significant gender differences: females showed lower Peak Ytm, smaller Vea, and higher TW than males.
Conclusions:
- Current tympanometric normative data may require minor adjustments for Vea and TW.
- Gender is a critical factor influencing tympanometric measures in young adults.
- Clinicians should consider gender-specific differences when interpreting tympanometric results for accurate middle ear assessment.


