Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Information Processing Approach

Information Processing Approach

The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

International journal of audiology reviewer contact information.

International journal of audiology·2018

Same author

Doctor of audiology (AuD) program at the University of South Florida.

American journal of audiology·2005

Same author

Development of low-frequency tone burst versus the click auditory brainstem response.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2005

Same author

Unilateral hearing loss in children with shunt-treated hydrocephalus.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2004

Same author

Update on bilateral cochlear implantation.

Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery·2003

Same author

An abbreviated word recognition protocol based on item difficulty.

Ear and hearing·2003

Same journal

Cochlear Implantation in Children Without a Hearing Aid Trial: A Case Series of 22 Patients.

American journal of audiology·2026

Same journal

Associations Between Self-Reported Workload and Measures of Speech Recognition in Adults Across the Lifespan.

American journal of audiology·2026

Same journal

Emotion-Specific Associations Between Perceived Sound Quality and Auditory Emotion Recognition in Children With Cochlear Implants.

American journal of audiology·2026

Same journal

Development and Validation of Modified Basic English Lexicon Sentences for Use With a Pediatric Population.

American journal of audiology·2026

Same journal

Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Survey of Texas Shop Teachers.

American journal of audiology·2026

Same journal

Auditory Spatial Processing in Patients With Vestibular Migraine.

American journal of audiology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Effectiveness of Central Auditory Processing Tests With Children.

Jay Singer, Raymond M Hurley, John P Preece

American Journal of Audiology

|December 10, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated central auditory processing (CAP) tests for children with learning disabilities. The Binaural Fusion Test (BFT) and Filtered Speech Test (FST) showed the most efficacy in identifying CAP disorders.

More Related Videos

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

Area of Science:

Audiology
Neuroscience
Developmental Psychology

Background:

Central Auditory Processing Disorders (CAPDs) can impact learning in children.
Accurate identification of CAPDs is crucial for effective intervention.
Existing CAP test batteries require evaluation for clinical utility and cost-effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine the efficacy of individual central auditory processing (CAP) tests and test batteries.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of identifying children with potential CAPDs.
To apply clinical decision analysis (CDA) to CAP test evaluation.

Main Methods:

Administered a battery of seven CAP tests to 91 normal learning (NL) children and 147 children with classroom learning disabilities (CLD).
Tested children aged 7 to 13 years.
Utilized clinical decision analysis (CDA) to evaluate test performance and costs.

Main Results:

The Binaural Fusion Test (BFT) demonstrated the highest efficacy in differentiating between NL and CLD samples.
The Filtered Speech Test (FST) was the second most effective individual test.
A test battery combining BFT and FST, or BFT and Masking Level Difference (MLD) test, offered the best balance of accuracy and cost.

Conclusions:

BFT and FST represent an effective combination for identifying children with CAPDs.
BFT and MLD provide a highly reliable test battery for confirming CAPD in children with CLD.
Clinical decision analysis is a valuable framework for optimizing CAP test selection.