Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Clinical Reasoning Tasks and Resident Physicians: What Do They Reason About?
Elexis McBee1, Temple Ratcliffe, Mark Goldszmidt
1E. McBee is assistant professor of medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, based at Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California. T. Ratcliffe is assistant professor of medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas. M. Goldszmidt is associate professor of medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. L. Schuwirth is professor of medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. K. Picho is assistant professor of medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. A.R. Artino Jr is associate professor of preventive medicine and biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland. J. Masel is third-year resident, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland. S.J. Durning is professor of medicine and pathology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Internal medicine residents utilize varied clinical reasoning tasks, not a fixed sequence, when diagnosing common cases. This study explored 14 distinct tasks, highlighting the dynamic nature of clinical decision-making in medical education.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Clinical Reasoning
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- A recently developed framework outlines 24 clinical reasoning tasks involved in patient encounters.
- Understanding the specific reasoning processes employed by residents is crucial for effective medical training.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical reasoning tasks used by internal medicine residents when managing straightforward clinical cases.
- To apply a framework of 24 diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning tasks to analyze resident decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Ten internal medicine residents viewed three video-recorded clinical encounters with common diagnoses.
- Participants completed post-encounter forms and underwent think-aloud protocols.
- Transcripts were analyzed using constant comparative analysis and iterative coding based on the clinical reasoning task framework.
Main Results:
- Residents used 14 distinct clinical reasoning tasks across the three cases, primarily related to framing the encounter and diagnosis.
- The sequence of task utilization varied among residents and cases.
- Average tasks per case ranged from 4.4 to 4.7, with repeated use of certain tasks.
Conclusions:
- Clinical reasoning in residents appears to be a varied and non-sequential process.
- The findings suggest a need to refine the existing framework to better capture the full spectrum of reasoning tasks in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Critical Thinking II
Patient-centered Care
Critical Thinking I
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

