Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Studying Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling by Aortic Debanding in Rodents
Published on: July 14, 2021
Incidence and prognosis implications of long term left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with dilated
Isabel Ruiz-Zamora1, Jorge Rodriguez-Capitan2, Alicia Guerrero-Molina3
1Calahorra Hospital Foundation, La Rioja, Spain.
Insights
Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) occurred in over half of dilated cardiomyopathy patients, improving prognosis. Fewer coronary stenoses, milder symptoms, and less mitral regurgitation predict LVRR success.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is not well understood with current treatments.
- Understanding LVRR incidence, predictors, and long-term outcomes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence of LVRR in DCM patients.
- To identify factors predicting LVRR.
- To assess the long-term prognosis of patients with LVRR.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 387 consecutive DCM outpatients.
- Mean follow-up of 50.4 months.
- Statistical analysis to identify predictors of LVRR and prognosis.
Main Results:
- Sustained LVRR observed in 57.6% of patients.
- Independent predictors of LVRR included fewer coronary stenoses, lower NYHA Functional Class, and less mitral regurgitation.
- LVRR and time to achieve it were strong predictors of long-term prognosis.
Conclusions:
- Sustained LVRR is common in DCM and linked to significantly better outcomes.
- A simple model including coronary stenosis, NYHA FC, and mitral regurgitation can prognosticate LVRR.
- Achieving LVRR and the speed of its achievement are critical for long-term prognosis in DCM.
Background:
Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) in dilated cardiomyopathy is poorly known within the context of current therapeutic approach. Our goal is to describe the present incidence of LVRR, the factors able to predict it and the long term prognosis of these patients.
Methods And Results:
We performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort or 387 consecutive outpatients. Mean follow-up was 50.4 ± 28.4 months. Sustained LVRR occurred in 57.6% of patients. The number of coronary arteries with severe stenosis (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.86; p=0.001), New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA FC) (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.54; p<0.001) as well as the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the end of follow-up (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58; p<0.001) and the time until first event (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p<0.001) were independent predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction improvement. LVRR was tightly related to prognosis due to the fact that both improvement in cardiac function achieving normal or slightly impaired LVEF (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17-0.56; p<0.001) and shorter time to achieve LVRR (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99; p=0.017) formed part of the best model for predicting events in DCM.
Conclusion:
More than half of the patients showed sustained LVRR associated with a significantly better prognosis. Fewer numbers of coronary arteries with severe stenosis, milder NYHA FC and the absence of significant MR at the end of follow-up as well as longer event free period formed a simple model to prognosticate LVRR. LVRR and the time to achieve it were strongly related to long term prognosis in patients with DCM.
More Related Videos
09:37Permanent Ligation of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery in Mice: A Model of Post-myocardial Infarction Remodelling and Heart Failure
Published on: December 2, 2014
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy