Related Experiment Videos
Knee dislocation and vascular injury: 4 year experience at a UK Major Trauma Centre and vascular hub
Simon Parker1, Ashok Handa1, Mark Deakin2
1Dept of Vascular Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Insights
Knee dislocations rarely cause vascular injury, but initial assessment of pedal pulses can be misleading. A formal protocol is needed for consistent evaluation of knee dislocation and associated vascular compromise.
Area of Science:
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Trauma Management
Background:
- Knee dislocation is a rare but severe injury with variable reported rates of associated vascular compromise.
- Current diagnostic and investigative approaches for vascular injury in knee dislocations are debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the experience of a UK Major Trauma Centre and vascular hub in managing knee dislocations and associated vascular injuries over a 4-year period.
- To assess the effectiveness of diagnostic methods and identify areas for improvement in management pathways.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 25 knee dislocation cases (defined by disruption of ≥2 major ligaments and gross instability) from 2010-2014.
- Analysis of patient records, imaging, and clinical notes focusing on vascular status documentation and investigations.
Main Results:
- One case (4%) of knee dislocation had a vascular injury requiring femoro-popliteal bypass.
- Vascular status was documented in 24 patients; pedal pulses were specifically mentioned in 17.
- Non-invasive investigations included hand-held Doppler (n=2); angiography was performed in 3 cases. No duplex ultrasound was used.
Conclusions:
- The observed rate of vascular injury aligns with recent large studies.
- Selective non-invasive testing and angiography appear safe for detecting vascular compromise.
- Inconsistent management and over-reliance on initial pedal pulse assessment highlight the need for a standardized, evidence-based protocol.
Introduction:
Knee dislocation is a rare but potentially devastating injury. Quoted rates of associated vascular compromise vary dramatically between 3.3% and 64%, and the best approach to investigate and diagnose such an injury remains controversial. We aim to evaluate our own 4-year experience of knee dislocation and vascular injury as a UK Major Trauma Centre and vascular hub.
Methods:
Knee dislocation was defined as disruption of at least two major stabilising ligaments of the knee and gross instability requiring an operation. Patients were identified from the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics patient database across a 4 year period from 2010 to 2014. Electronic patient records, imaging and hard notes were retrieved and reviewed retrospectively and relevant information recorded.
Results:
Twenty-five cases of knee dislocation were identified. Male to female ratio was 11.5:1 with a mean age of 33 years (range 17-71). One patient had a vascular injury which ultimately required a femoro-popliteal bypass graft. Twenty-four patients had documented examination findings pertaining to the vascular status of the limb. Seventeen patients had specific reference to the presence or absence of pedal pulses. The remaining seven cases were documented as either "warm well perfused" or "neurovascularly in-tact". Nine patients were discharged directly from the emergency department with outpatient follow up. All admitted cases had documented vascular examination findings the following day. Two patients had additional adjunctive non-invasive investigations. No patients were examined with duplex ultrasound, although two patients had pulses confirmed with hand-held doppler ultrasound. Three patients had an angiogram. Four cases have a documented discussion with or review from a vascular surgeon.
Discussion And Conclusions:
Our rates of vascular injury are in line with the most recent and largest study to date. Non-invasive investigation and selective angiography has been safe in identifying significant vascular compromise, however, there is inconsistency in management pathways, and too much reassurance attributed to the presence of pedal pulses on initial examination. Safety and consistency could be improved with the introduction of a formalised evidence-based protocol for the initial evaluation of knee dislocation and vascular injury.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care