Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

06:23
The 4 Mountains Test: A Short Test of Spatial Memory with High Sensitivity for the Diagnosis of Pre-dementia Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: October 13, 2016
34.2K
Reassessing the "traditional background hypothesis" for elevated MMPI and MMPI-2 Lie-scale scores
Gerald M Rosen1, Scott A Baldwin2, Ronald E Smith3
1Independent Practice.
Psychological Assessment
|December 15, 2015
Summary
Religious individuals do not score significantly higher on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) Lie scale. This study examined if religious backgrounds influence MMPI-2 L scale scores, finding minimal impact.
Area of Science:
- Psychological assessment
- Personality psychology
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) Lie (L) scale measures conscious efforts to deny flaws and appear overly positive.
- The MMPI-2 manual suggests traditional and religious backgrounds may explain elevated L scale scores (65T-79T).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the hypothesis that religious backgrounds lead to elevated MMPI L scale scores.
- To determine if religious individuals exhibit "fake good" impression management or virtuousness.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed 11 studies using the original MMPI with religious samples.
- Conducted a meta-analysis of 12 MMPI-2 studies comparing L scores of religious samples to normative data.
Main Results:
- Only one of the 11 original MMPI studies found an elevated mean L score.
- Meta-analysis showed significant heterogeneity (I2 = 87.1).
- Religious samples had slightly higher L scores (d¯ = 0.54), averaging 5 t-score points higher, but not reaching manual-specified limits.
Conclusions:
- Religious group membership minimally impacts MMPI-2 L scale scores, accounting for approximately 5 t-score points.
- The interpretation of these modest elevations as "fake good" or religious virtuousness remains inconclusive.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
1.1K
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
1.1K
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
385
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
385
Reliability and Validity
14.4K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.4K
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
2.3K
David Wechsler, a psychologist who worked with World War I veterans, developed a significant IQ test in 1939 called the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. This test was innovative because it combined several subtests that measured both verbal and nonverbal skills, reflecting Wechsler's belief that intelligence is a global capacity involving purposeful action, rational thinking, and effective interaction with the environment. This test later evolved into the Wechsler Adult Intelligence...
2.3K

