Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 29, 2026

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
Published on: June 3, 2020
Alzheimer Disease and Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia: Automatic Classification Based on Cortical Atrophy
Christiane Möller1, Yolande A L Pijnenburg1, Wiesje M van der Flier1
1From the Alzheimer Center and Department of Neurology (C.M., Y.A.L.P., W.M.v.d.F., B.T., E.D., P.S.), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.V., F.B., H.V., A.M.W.), Department of Physics and Medical Technology (J.C.d.M., H.V.), and Department of Clinical Genetics (J.v.S.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, APO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychology (A.H., S.A.R.B.R., E.D.) and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (A.H., S.A.R.B.R.), Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (A.H., S.A.R.B.R., J.v.d.G.); and Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (J.v.S., E.D.).
Abstract:
Purpose To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of an image-based classifier to distinguish between Alzheimer disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) in individual patients by using gray matter (GM) density maps computed from standard T1-weighted structural images obtained with multiple imagers and with independent training and prediction data. Materials and Methods The local institutional review board approved the study. Eighty-four patients with AD, 51 patients with bvFTD, and 94 control subjects were divided into independent training (n = 115) and prediction (n = 114) sets with identical diagnosis and imager type distributions. Training of a support vector machine (SVM) classifier used diagnostic status and GM density maps and produced voxelwise discrimination maps. Discriminant function analysis was used to estimate suitability of the extracted weights for single-subject classification in the prediction set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated for image-based classifiers and neuropsychological z scores. Results Training accuracy of the SVM was 85% for patients with AD versus control subjects, 72% for patients with bvFTD versus control subjects, and 79% for patients with AD versus patients with bvFTD (P ≤ .029). Single-subject diagnosis in the prediction set when using the discrimination maps yielded accuracies of 88% for patients with AD versus control subjects, 85% for patients with bvFTD versus control subjects, and 82% for patients with AD versus patients with bvFTD, with a good to excellent AUC (range, 0.81-0.95; P ≤ .001). Machine learning-based categorization of AD versus bvFTD based on GM density maps outperforms classification based on neuropsychological test results. Conclusion The SVM can be used in single-subject discrimination and can help the clinician arrive at a diagnosis. The SVM can be used to distinguish disease-specific GM patterns in patients with AD and those with bvFTD as compared with normal aging by using common T1-weighted structural MR imaging. (©) RSNA, 2015.
More Related Videos
08:43Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: August 7, 2017
09:47Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
Published on: December 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Dementia
The progression of dementia is generally gradual....